NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q versus NVIDIA Quadro K510M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q and NVIDIA Quadro K510M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 5 ans 6 mois plus tard
- Environ 5% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 885 MHz versus 846 MHz
- 12x plus de pipelines: 2304 versus 192
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 12 nm versus 28 nm
- 5.8x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 14000 MHz versus 2400 MHz
- 18.3x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 11744 versus 641
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 483 versus 441
- 15.9x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 17328 versus 1087
- 4.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8912 versus 2012
- 2.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8055 versus 3071
- 15.9x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 17328 versus 1087
- 4.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8912 versus 2012
- 2.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8055 versus 3071
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 29 January 2019 versus 23 July 2013 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 885 MHz versus 846 MHz |
| Pipelines | 2304 versus 192 |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm versus 28 nm |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz versus 2400 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 11744 versus 641 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 483 versus 441 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 17328 versus 1087 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8912 versus 2012 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8055 versus 3071 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 17328 versus 1087 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8912 versus 2012 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8055 versus 3071 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro K510M
- 3.8x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 30 Watt versus 115 Watt
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt versus 115 Watt |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K510M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | NVIDIA Quadro K510M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 11744 | 641 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 483 | 441 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 78123 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 168.08 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1935.102 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 22.794 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 111.023 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1001.496 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 17328 | 1087 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8912 | 2012 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8055 | 3071 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 17328 | 1087 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8912 | 2012 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8055 | 3071 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 6839 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | NVIDIA Quadro K510M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Kepler 2.0 |
| Nom de code | TU106 | GK208 |
| Date de sortie | 29 January 2019 | 23 July 2013 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 178 | 835 |
| Genre | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1185 MHz | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 885 MHz | 846 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 2304 | 192 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt | 30 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 10,800 million | 1270 Million |
| Performance á point flottant | 324.9 gflops | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 13.54 GTexel / s | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
| Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz | 2400 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| RAM maximale | 1 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 19.2 GB / s | |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision Pro | ||
| Mosaic | ||
| nView Display Management | ||
| Optimus | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon RX 5700
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q vs
IntelArc A730M
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q vs
AppleM1 Ultra 48-core
