NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super versus NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 5 mois plus tard
- 2.2x plus de vitesse du noyau: 1605 MHz versus 735 MHz
- Environ 62% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1770 MHz versus 1095 MHz
- Environ 17% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 14000 MHz versus 12000 MHz
- Environ 39% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 18255 versus 13171
- Environ 65% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 885 versus 537
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 99610 versus 83054
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4045.784 versus 3676.805
- Environ 28% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 29.145 versus 22.75
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1438.826 versus 1116.69
- Environ 32% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 25232 versus 19139
- Environ 32% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 25232 versus 19139
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 2 July 2019 versus 29 January 2019 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1605 MHz versus 735 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1770 MHz versus 1095 MHz |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz versus 12000 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 18255 versus 13171 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 885 versus 537 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 99610 versus 83054 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4045.784 versus 3676.805 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 29.145 versus 22.75 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1438.826 versus 1116.69 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 25232 versus 19139 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 25232 versus 19139 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
- Environ 15% de pipelines plus haut: 2944 versus 2560
- Environ 43% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 150 Watt versus 215 Watt
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 297.996 versus 293.508
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 162.692 versus 158.103
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8905 versus 3718
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8060 versus 3359
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8905 versus 3718
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8060 versus 3359
- 1137.3x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 7961 versus 7
| Caractéristiques | |
| Pipelines | 2944 versus 2560 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt versus 215 Watt |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 297.996 versus 293.508 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 162.692 versus 158.103 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8905 versus 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8060 versus 3359 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8905 versus 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8060 versus 3359 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7961 versus 7 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 18255 | 13171 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 885 | 537 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 99610 | 83054 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 293.508 | 297.996 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4045.784 | 3676.805 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 29.145 | 22.75 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 158.103 | 162.692 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1438.826 | 1116.69 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 25232 | 19139 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 8905 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 8060 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 25232 | 19139 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 8905 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 8060 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7 | 7961 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Turing |
| Nom de code | TU104 | TU104B |
| Date de sortie | 2 July 2019 | 29 January 2019 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $499 | |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 134 | 142 |
| Genre | Desktop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1770 MHz | 1095 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1605 MHz | 735 MHz |
| Noyaux CUDA | 2560 | |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Température maximale du GPU | 88 C | |
| Pipelines | 2560 | 2944 |
| Render output units | 64 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 215 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 13.6 B | 13,600 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Display Port | 1.4 | |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
| Nombre d’écrans á la fois | 4 | |
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Hauteur | 4.556” (115.7mm) | |
| Longeur | 10.5” (266.74mm) | |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 650 Watt | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 6 pin + 8 pin | |
| Largeur | 2-Slot | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 8 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 448 GB/s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 256 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz | 12000 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Technologies |
||
| Ansel | ||
| HDMI 2.0b | ||
| SLI | ||
| VR Ready | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Super vs
NVIDIATesla V100 SXM2 16 GB
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Super vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega 56 Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Super vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Super vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Super vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4050 Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Super vs
NVIDIAT1000 8 GB
