NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super versus NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 9 mois plus tard
- Environ 19% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1605 MHz versus 1350 MHz
- Environ 15% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1770 MHz versus 1545 MHz
- Environ 16% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 215 Watt versus 250 Watt
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 25232 versus 23659
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 25232 versus 23659
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 2 July 2019 versus 20 September 2018 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1605 MHz versus 1350 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1770 MHz versus 1545 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 215 Watt versus 250 Watt |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 25232 versus 23659 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 versus 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 25232 versus 23659 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 versus 3358 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 21785 versus 18253
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 935 versus 885
- Environ 39% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 138583 versus 99912
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 394.035 versus 293.508
- Environ 35% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 5461.22 versus 4045.784
- Environ 41% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 41.133 versus 29.145
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 173.697 versus 158.103
- Environ 38% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1987.605 versus 1438.826
- 2085.6x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 14599 versus 7
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 21785 versus 18253 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 935 versus 885 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 138583 versus 99912 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 394.035 versus 293.508 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 5461.22 versus 4045.784 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 41.133 versus 29.145 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 173.697 versus 158.103 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1987.605 versus 1438.826 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 14599 versus 7 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 18253 | 21785 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 885 | 935 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 99912 | 138583 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 293.508 | 394.035 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4045.784 | 5461.22 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 29.145 | 41.133 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 158.103 | 173.697 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1438.826 | 1987.605 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 25232 | 23659 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 25232 | 23659 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3358 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7 | 14599 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Turing |
| Nom de code | TU104 | TU102 |
| Date de sortie | 2 July 2019 | 20 September 2018 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $499 | $999 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 133 | 83 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Prix maintenant | $1,279.99 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 17.22 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1770 MHz | 1545 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1605 MHz | 1350 MHz |
| Noyaux CUDA | 2560 | |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Température maximale du GPU | 88 C | |
| Pipelines | 2560 | |
| Render output units | 64 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 215 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 13.6 B | 18,600 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Display Port | 1.4 | |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
| Nombre d’écrans á la fois | 4 | |
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Hauteur | 4.556” (115.7mm) | |
| Longeur | 10.5” (266.74mm) | 267 mm |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 650 Watt | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 6 pin + 8 pin | 2x 8-pin |
| Largeur | 2-Slot | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 8 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 448 GB/s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz | 14000 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | |
Technologies |
||
| Ansel | ||
| HDMI 2.0b | ||
| SLI | ||
| VR Ready | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Super vs
NVIDIATesla V100 SXM2 16 GB
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Super vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega 56 Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Super vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Super vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Super vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4050 Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Super vs
NVIDIAT1000 8 GB
