NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile versus AMD Radeon R9 Fury
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile and AMD Radeon R9 Fury pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 4 ans 8 mois plus tard
- Environ 56% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1560 MHz versus 1000 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 299.5 GTexel/s versus 224.0 GTexel / s
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 12 nm versus 28 nm
- Environ 83% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 150 Watt versus 275 Watt
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 8 GB versus 4 GB
- 3.5x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) versus 500 MHz
- 2.3x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 10790 versus 4739
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20291 versus 10116
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20291 versus 10116
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 2 Apr 2020 versus 10 July 2015 |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1560 MHz versus 1000 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 299.5 GTexel/s versus 224.0 GTexel / s |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt versus 275 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 8 GB versus 4 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) versus 500 MHz |
| Référence | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 10790 versus 4739 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20291 versus 10116 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20291 versus 10116 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R9 Fury
- Environ 17% de pipelines plus haut: 3584 versus 3072
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 versus 3652
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 versus 3652
- 57.9x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 versus 58
- 57.9x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 versus 58
| Caractéristiques | |
| Pipelines | 3584 versus 3072 |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 versus 3652 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 versus 3652 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 versus 58 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 versus 58 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 Fury
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile | AMD Radeon R9 Fury |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 10790 | 4739 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20291 | 10116 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20291 | 10116 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3652 | 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3652 | 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 58 | 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 58 | 3356 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 9592 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 796 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 53650 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 140.274 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3595.432 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.082 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 132.701 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 789.536 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile | AMD Radeon R9 Fury | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 3.0 |
| Nom de code | TU104 | Fiji |
| Date de sortie | 2 Apr 2020 | 10 July 2015 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 204 | 278 |
| Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
| Conception | AMD Radeon R9 Fury Series | |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $549 | |
| Prix maintenant | $399.99 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 35.98 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1560 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1365 MHz | |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 299.5 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 19.17 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 9.585 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 3072 | 3584 |
| Pixel fill rate | 99.84 GPixel/s | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 299.5 GTexel/s | 224.0 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 275 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 13600 million | 8,900 million |
| Unités de Compute | 56 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 7,168 gflops | |
| Stream Processors | 3584 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Nombre d’écrans Eyefinity | 6 | |
| VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 2x 8-pin |
| Largeur | Dual-slot | |
| Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
| Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
| Mantle | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 448.0 GB/s | 512 GB/s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 4096 bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) | 500 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) |
| Mémoire de la bande passante haute (HBM) | ||
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| DDMA audio | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| FRTC | ||
| HD3D | ||
| LiquidVR | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| TressFX | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile vs
NVIDIAGRID M10-8Q
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile vs
AMDRadeon RX 590 GME
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile vs
AppleA14 Bionic
