NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti versus NVIDIA Tesla T4
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti and NVIDIA Tesla T4 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 7 mois plus tard
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 8 nm versus 12 nm
- Environ 57% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 200.776 versus 127.622
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16098 versus 14076
- Environ 88% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 versus 1976
- Environ 89% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 versus 1781
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16098 versus 14076
- Environ 88% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 versus 1976
- Environ 89% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 versus 1781
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 11 May 2021 versus 13 September 2018 |
| Processus de fabrication | 8 nm versus 12 nm |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 200.776 versus 127.622 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16098 versus 14076 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 versus 1976 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 versus 1781 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16098 versus 14076 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 versus 1976 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 versus 1781 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Tesla T4
- Environ 37% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1005 MHz versus 735 MHz
- Environ 46% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1515 MHz versus 1035 MHz
- 6.7x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 10000 MHz versus 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 10909 versus 10167
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 596 versus 497
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 61276 versus 57386
- Environ 56% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3026.812 versus 1938.08
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 18.798 versus 15.298
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 119.936 versus 108.443
- Environ 60% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 910.721 versus 568.183
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1005 MHz versus 735 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1515 MHz versus 1035 MHz |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 10000 MHz versus 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 10909 versus 10167 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 596 versus 497 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 61276 versus 57386 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3026.812 versus 1938.08 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 18.798 versus 15.298 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 119.936 versus 108.443 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 910.721 versus 568.183 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla T4
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti | NVIDIA Tesla T4 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 10167 | 10909 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 497 | 596 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 57386 | 61276 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 200.776 | 127.622 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1938.08 | 3026.812 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 15.298 | 18.798 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 108.443 | 119.936 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 568.183 | 910.721 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16098 | 14076 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 1976 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 1781 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16098 | 14076 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 1976 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 1781 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5393 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti | NVIDIA Tesla T4 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
| Nom de code | GA106 | TU104 |
| Date de sortie | 11 May 2021 | 13 September 2018 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 268 | 263 |
| Genre | Laptop | Workstation |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1035 MHz | 1515 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 735 MHz | 1005 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 8 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 82.80 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 5.299 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 5.299 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 2560 | |
| Pixel fill rate | 49.68 GPixel/s | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 82.80 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 12000 million | 13,600 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | Portable Device Dependent | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Facteur de forme | IGP | |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | None |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 192.0 GB/s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 bit | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective | 10000 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 Ti vs
AMDRadeon HD 6610M
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 Ti vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 Ti vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 Ti vs
AMDRadeon Pro 5600M
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 Ti vs
AMDRadeon Pro W6600M
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 Ti vs
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile
