NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 5 ans 5 mois plus tard
- Environ 41% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1410 MHz versus 1000 MHz
- Environ 55% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1665 MHz versus 1075 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 253.1 GTexel/s versus 176 billion / sec
- Environ 73% de pipelines plus haut: 4864 versus 2816
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 8 nm versus 28 nm
- Environ 25% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 200 Watt versus 250 Watt
- Environ 33% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 8 GB versus 6 GB
- 250x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) versus 7.0 GB/s
- Environ 48% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 20394 versus 13758
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 989 versus 852
- 2.5x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 109075 versus 42988
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 323.141 versus 145.843
- 2.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4756.579 versus 1722.98
- 3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 35.311 versus 11.661
- 4.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 150.943 versus 37.16
- Environ 87% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1474.189 versus 788.464
- 2.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 27478 versus 10471
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 versus 3695
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3360 versus 3338
- 2.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 27478 versus 10471
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 versus 3695
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3360 versus 3338
- 2x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2671 versus 1321
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 1 Dec 2020 versus 2 June 2015 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1410 MHz versus 1000 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1665 MHz versus 1075 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 253.1 GTexel/s versus 176 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 4864 versus 2816 |
Processus de fabrication | 8 nm versus 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 200 Watt versus 250 Watt |
Taille de mémore maximale | 8 GB versus 6 GB |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) versus 7.0 GB/s |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 20394 versus 13758 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 989 versus 852 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 109075 versus 42988 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 323.141 versus 145.843 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4756.579 versus 1722.98 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 35.311 versus 11.661 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 150.943 versus 37.16 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1474.189 versus 788.464 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 27478 versus 10471 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 versus 3695 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 versus 3338 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 27478 versus 10471 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 versus 3695 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 versus 3338 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2671 versus 1321 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 20394 | 13758 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 989 | 852 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 109075 | 42988 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 323.141 | 145.843 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4756.579 | 1722.98 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 35.311 | 11.661 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 150.943 | 37.16 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1474.189 | 788.464 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 27478 | 10471 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3695 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | 3338 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 27478 | 10471 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3695 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | 3338 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2671 | 1321 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Maxwell 2.0 |
Nom de code | GA104 | GM200 |
Date de sortie | 1 Dec 2020 | 2 June 2015 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $399 | $649 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 104 | 310 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Prix maintenant | $679.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 23.43 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1665 MHz | 1075 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1410 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 8 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 253.1 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 16.20 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 16.20 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 4864 | 2816 |
Pixel fill rate | 133.2 GPixel/s | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 253.1 GTexel/s | 176 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 200 Watt | 250 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 17400 million | 8,000 million |
Noyaux CUDA | 2816 | |
Performance á point flottant | 6,060 gflops | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2 |
Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
HDCP | ||
Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Facteur de forme | Dual-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 242 mm (9.5 inches) | 10.5" (26.7 cm) |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 350 Watt | 600 Watt |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 12-pin | 6-pin + 8-pin |
Largeur | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | |
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Options SLI | 4x | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 8 GB | 6 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 448 GB/s | 336.5 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 384 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) | 7.0 GB/s |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive Vertical Sync | ||
CUDA | ||
GameStream | ||
GameWorks | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
GPU Boost | ||
SLI | ||
Surround |