NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
Vergleichende Analyse von NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti und NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher, Technologien. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 5 Jahr(e) 5 Monat(e) später
- Etwa 41% höhere Kerntaktfrequenz:1410 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- Etwa 55% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 1665 MHz vs 1075 MHz
- 1438.1x mehr Texturfüllrate: 253.1 GTexel/s vs 176 billion / sec
- Etwa 73% höhere Leitungssysteme: 4864 vs 2816
- Ein neuerer Herstellungsprozess ermöglicht eine leistungsfähigere, aber dennoch kühlere Grafikkarte: 8 nm vs 28 nm
- Etwa 25% geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 200 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Um etwa 33% höhere maximale Speichergröße: 8 GB vs 6 GB
- 250x mehr Speichertaktfrequenz: 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) vs 7.0 GB/s
- Etwa 48% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 20394 vs 13758
- Etwa 16% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 989 vs 852
- 2.5x bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 109075 vs 42988
- 2.2x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 323.141 vs 145.843
- 2.8x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4756.579 vs 1722.98
- 3x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 35.311 vs 11.661
- 4.1x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 150.943 vs 37.16
- Etwa 87% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1474.189 vs 788.464
- 2.6x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 27478 vs 10471
- Etwa 1% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 vs 3695
- Etwa 1% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3360 vs 3338
- 2.6x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 27478 vs 10471
- Etwa 1% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 vs 3695
- Etwa 1% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3360 vs 3338
- 2x bessere Leistung in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2671 vs 1321
Spezifikationen | |
Startdatum | 1 Dec 2020 vs 2 June 2015 |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1410 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1665 MHz vs 1075 MHz |
Texturfüllrate | 253.1 GTexel/s vs 176 billion / sec |
Leitungssysteme | 4864 vs 2816 |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 8 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 200 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Maximale Speichergröße | 8 GB vs 6 GB |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) vs 7.0 GB/s |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 20394 vs 13758 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 989 vs 852 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 109075 vs 42988 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 323.141 vs 145.843 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4756.579 vs 1722.98 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 35.311 vs 11.661 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 150.943 vs 37.16 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1474.189 vs 788.464 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 27478 vs 10471 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 vs 3695 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 vs 3338 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 27478 vs 10471 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 vs 3695 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 vs 3338 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2671 vs 1321 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 20394 | 13758 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 989 | 852 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 109075 | 42988 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 323.141 | 145.843 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4756.579 | 1722.98 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 35.311 | 11.661 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 150.943 | 37.16 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1474.189 | 788.464 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 27478 | 10471 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3695 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | 3338 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 27478 | 10471 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3695 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | 3338 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2671 | 1321 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur | Ampere | Maxwell 2.0 |
Codename | GA104 | GM200 |
Startdatum | 1 Dec 2020 | 2 June 2015 |
Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $399 | $649 |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 104 | 310 |
Typ | Desktop | Desktop |
Jetzt kaufen | $679.99 | |
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis (0-100) | 23.43 | |
Technische Info |
||
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1665 MHz | 1075 MHz |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1410 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 8 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 253.1 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 16.20 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 16.20 TFLOPS | |
Leitungssysteme | 4864 | 2816 |
Pixel fill rate | 133.2 GPixel/s | |
Texturfüllrate | 253.1 GTexel/s | 176 billion / sec |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 200 Watt | 250 Watt |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 17400 million | 8,000 million |
CUDA-Kerne | 2816 | |
Gleitkomma-Leistung | 6,060 gflops | |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
Display-Anschlüsse | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2 |
Audioeingang für HDMI | Internal | |
G-SYNC-Unterstützung | ||
HDCP | ||
Maximale VGA-Auflösung | 2048x1536 | |
Multi-Monitor-Unterstützung | ||
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Formfaktor | Dual-slot | |
Schnittstelle | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Länge | 242 mm (9.5 inches) | 10.5" (26.7 cm) |
Empfohlene Systemleistung (PSU) | 350 Watt | 600 Watt |
Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | 1x 12-pin | 6-pin + 8-pin |
Breite | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | |
Busunterstützung | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Höhe | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
SLI-Optionen | 4x | |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Speicher |
||
Maximale RAM-Belastung | 8 GB | 6 GB |
Speicherbandbreite | 448 GB/s | 336.5 GB / s |
Breite des Speicherbusses | 256 bit | 384 Bit |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) | 7.0 GB/s |
Speichertyp | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Gemeinsamer Speicher | 0 | |
Technologien |
||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive Vertical Sync | ||
CUDA | ||
GameStream | ||
GameWorks | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
GPU Boost | ||
SLI | ||
Surround |