NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q versus AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q and AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 6 mois plus tard
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 206.4 GTexel/s versus 304.8 GT/s
- 2.8x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 80 Watt versus 225 Watt
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 92696 versus 77476
- Environ 78% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 449.647 versus 252.601
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4619.617 versus 3949.565
- Environ 47% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 36.308 versus 24.769
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1410.887 versus 1322.129
- Environ 69% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 24877 versus 14699
- 3.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 11471 versus 3720
- 4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 13334 versus 3369
- Environ 69% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 24877 versus 14699
- 3.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 11471 versus 3720
- 4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 13334 versus 3369
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2380 versus 2134
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 12 Jan 2021 versus 7 July 2019 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 206.4 GTexel/s versus 304.8 GT/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt versus 225 Watt |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 92696 versus 77476 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 449.647 versus 252.601 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4619.617 versus 3949.565 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 36.308 versus 24.769 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1410.887 versus 1322.129 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 24877 versus 14699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 11471 versus 3720 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 13334 versus 3369 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 24877 versus 14699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 11471 versus 3720 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 13334 versus 3369 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2380 versus 2134 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
- 2.1x plus de vitesse du noyau: 1605 MHz versus 780 MHz
- Environ 48% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1905 MHz versus 1290 MHz
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 16357 versus 15361
- Environ 43% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 921 versus 643
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 254.777 versus 181.818
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1605 MHz versus 780 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1905 MHz versus 1290 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 16357 versus 15361 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 921 versus 643 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 254.777 versus 181.818 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q | AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 15361 | 16357 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 643 | 921 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 92696 | 77476 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 449.647 | 252.601 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4619.617 | 3949.565 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 36.308 | 24.769 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 181.818 | 254.777 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1410.887 | 1322.129 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 24877 | 14699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 11471 | 3720 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 13334 | 3369 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 24877 | 14699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 11471 | 3720 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 13334 | 3369 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2380 | 2134 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q | AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Ampere | RDNA |
Nom de code | GA104 | Navi 10 |
Date de sortie | 12 Jan 2021 | 7 July 2019 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 81 | 162 |
Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $400 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1290 MHz | 1905 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 780 MHz | 1605 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 8 nm | |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 206.4 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 13.21 TFLOPS (1:1) | 19.51 TFLOPs |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 13.21 TFLOPS | 9.75 TFLOPs |
Pipelines | 5120 | |
Pixel fill rate | 103.2 GPixel/s | 121.9 GP/s |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 206.4 GTexel/s | 304.8 GT/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt | 225 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 17400 million | 10.3 B |
Unités de Compute | 40 | |
Render output units | 64 | |
Stream Processors | 2560 | |
Texture Units | 160 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | Portable Device Dependent | |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
HDMI | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | |
Taille du laptop | large | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 1 x 8-pin and 1x6 pin |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 384.0 GB/s | 448 GB/s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 256 bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective | |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Technologies |
||
GPU Boost | ||
VR Ready | ||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) |