NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 versus NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 11 mois plus tard
- Environ 7% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1440 MHz versus 1350 MHz
- Environ 11% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1710 MHz versus 1545 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 8 nm versus 12 nm
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 25305 versus 21785
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 1041 versus 935
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 167693 versus 138583
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 457.414 versus 394.035
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 6022.79 versus 5461.22
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 51.221 versus 41.133
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 175.219 versus 173.697
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2381.93 versus 1987.605
- Environ 46% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 34537 versus 23659
- Environ 46% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 34537 versus 23659
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 17708 versus 14599
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 1 Sep 2020 versus 20 September 2018 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1440 MHz versus 1350 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1710 MHz versus 1545 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 8 nm versus 12 nm |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 25305 versus 21785 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1041 versus 935 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 167693 versus 138583 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 457.414 versus 394.035 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6022.79 versus 5461.22 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 51.221 versus 41.133 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 175.219 versus 173.697 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2381.93 versus 1987.605 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 34537 versus 23659 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 34537 versus 23659 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 17708 versus 14599 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
- Environ 28% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 250 Watt versus 320 Watt
- 11.8x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 14000 MHz versus 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective
Caractéristiques | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt versus 320 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz versus 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective |
Référence | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 versus 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 versus 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 versus 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 versus 3356 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 25305 | 21785 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1041 | 935 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 167693 | 138583 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 457.414 | 394.035 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6022.79 | 5461.22 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 51.221 | 41.133 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 175.219 | 173.697 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2381.93 | 1987.605 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 34537 | 23659 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 34537 | 23659 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3358 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 17708 | 14599 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
Nom de code | GA102 | TU102 |
Date de sortie | 1 Sep 2020 | 20 September 2018 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $699 | $999 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 52 | 83 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Prix maintenant | $1,279.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 17.22 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1710 MHz | 1545 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1440 MHz | 1350 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 8 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 465.1 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 29.77 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 29.77 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 8704 | |
Pixel fill rate | 164.2 GPixel/s | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 465.1 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 320 Watt | 250 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 28300 million | 18,600 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Facteur de forme | Dual-slot | |
Hauteur | 40 mm, 1.6 inches | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 285 mm, 11.2 inches | 267 mm |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 700 Watt | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 12-pin | 2x 8-pin |
Largeur | 112 mm, 4.4 inches | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 10 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 760.3 GB/s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 320 bit | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective | 14000 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6X |