NVIDIA P106-100 versus AMD Radeon Pro 570
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA P106-100 and AMD Radeon Pro 570 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA P106-100
- Environ 51% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1506 MHz versus 1000 MHz
- Environ 55% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1709 MHz versus 1105 MHz
- Environ 22% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 136.7 GTexel / s versus 112.0 GTexel / s
- Environ 22% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 4,375 gflops versus 3,584 gflops
- Environ 50% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 6 GB versus 4 GB
- Environ 18% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 8008 MHz versus 6800 MHz
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 6443 versus 6337
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 36274 versus 30269
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 163.993 versus 74.958
- Environ 59% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1705.321 versus 1070.209
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 9.266 versus 6.94
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 448.036 versus 436.958
- Environ 67% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12824 versus 7664
- Environ 67% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12824 versus 7664
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1506 MHz versus 1000 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1709 MHz versus 1105 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 136.7 GTexel / s versus 112.0 GTexel / s |
| Performance á point flottant | 4,375 gflops versus 3,584 gflops |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 6 GB versus 4 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 8008 MHz versus 6800 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6443 versus 6337 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 36274 versus 30269 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 163.993 versus 74.958 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1705.321 versus 1070.209 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 9.266 versus 6.94 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 448.036 versus 436.958 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12824 versus 7664 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12824 versus 7664 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Pro 570
- Environ 40% de pipelines plus haut: 1792 versus 1280
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 16 nm
- 2.8x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 697 versus 245
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 89.457 versus 76.32
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2340 versus 1860
- Environ 99% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3351 versus 1680
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2340 versus 1860
- Environ 99% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3351 versus 1680
| Caractéristiques | |
| Pipelines | 1792 versus 1280 |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 16 nm |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 697 versus 245 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 89.457 versus 76.32 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2340 versus 1860 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 versus 1680 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2340 versus 1860 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 versus 1680 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA P106-100
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro 570
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA P106-100 | AMD Radeon Pro 570 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6443 | 6337 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 245 | 697 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 36274 | 30269 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 163.993 | 74.958 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1705.321 | 1070.209 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 9.266 | 6.94 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 76.32 | 89.457 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 448.036 | 436.958 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12824 | 7664 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1860 | 2340 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1680 | 3351 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12824 | 7664 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1860 | 2340 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1680 | 3351 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4072 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA P106-100 | AMD Radeon Pro 570 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 4.0 |
| Nom de code | GP106 | Polaris 20 |
| Date de sortie | 19 June 2017 | 5 June 2017 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 435 | 436 |
| Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1709 MHz | 1105 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1506 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 4,375 gflops | 3,584 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 16 nm | 14 nm |
| Pipelines | 1280 | 1792 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 136.7 GTexel / s | 112.0 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | 120 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 4,400 million | 5,700 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 250 mm | 241 mm |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin | None |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 6 GB | 4 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 192.2 GB / s | 217.6 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 192 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 8008 MHz | 6800 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA P106-100 avec des autres
NVIDIAP106-100 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 9300 + nForce 730i
NVIDIAP106-100 vs
ATIFirePro V8700
NVIDIAP106-100 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX TITAN
NVIDIAP106-100 vs
AMDRadeon R9 280
NVIDIAP106-100 vs
AMDRadeon Pro WX 4170 Mobile
NVIDIAP106-100 vs
AMDRadeon Pro 570
