NVIDIA Quadro 6000 versus ATI Radeon HD 5870
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro 6000 and ATI Radeon HD 5870 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro 6000
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 2 mois plus tard
- 6x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 6 GB versus 1 GB
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 2691 versus 2213
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 449 versus 413
- 5.3x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 9850 versus 1857
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 24.377 versus 18.789
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.66 versus 1.775
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 10 December 2010 versus 23 September 2009 |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 6 GB versus 1 GB |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2691 versus 2213 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 449 versus 413 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9850 versus 1857 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 24.377 versus 18.789 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.66 versus 1.775 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3689 versus 3671 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3689 versus 3671 |
Raisons pour considerer le ATI Radeon HD 5870
- Environ 48% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 850 MHz versus 574 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 68.0 GTexel / s versus 32.1 GTexel / s
- 3.6x plus de pipelines: 1600 versus 448
- 2.6x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2,720.0 gflops versus 1,027.7 gflops
- Environ 9% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 188 Watt versus 204 Watt
- Environ 61% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 4800 MHz versus 2988 MHz
- Environ 69% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1339.688 versus 793.755
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 43.496 versus 34.891
- 2.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 245.813 versus 90.839
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4541 versus 3501
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4541 versus 3501
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 850 MHz versus 574 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 68.0 GTexel / s versus 32.1 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1600 versus 448 |
| Performance á point flottant | 2,720.0 gflops versus 1,027.7 gflops |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 188 Watt versus 204 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 4800 MHz versus 2988 MHz |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1339.688 versus 793.755 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 43.496 versus 34.891 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 245.813 versus 90.839 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4541 versus 3501 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3349 versus 3335 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4541 versus 3501 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3349 versus 3335 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro 6000
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 5870
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA Quadro 6000 | ATI Radeon HD 5870 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2691 | 2213 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 449 | 413 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9850 | 1857 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 24.377 | 18.789 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 793.755 | 1339.688 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.66 | 1.775 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 34.891 | 43.496 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 90.839 | 245.813 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3501 | 4541 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3689 | 3671 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3335 | 3349 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3501 | 4541 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3689 | 3671 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3335 | 3349 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA Quadro 6000 | ATI Radeon HD 5870 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Fermi | TeraScale 2 |
| Nom de code | GF100 | Cypress |
| Date de sortie | 10 December 2010 | 23 September 2009 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $4,399 | $399 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 781 | 782 |
| Prix maintenant | $332.21 | |
| Genre | Workstation | Desktop |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 12.86 | |
| Conception | ATI Radeon HD 5000 Series | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse du noyau | 574 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,027.7 gflops | 2,720.0 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 448 | 1600 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 32.1 GTexel / s | 68.0 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 204 Watt | 188 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 3,100 million | 2,154 million |
| Vitesse augmenté | 850 MHz | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 248 mm | 282 mm |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | 2x 6-pin |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 6 GB | 1 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 143.4 GB / s | 153.6 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 384 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 2988 MHz | 4800 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA Quadro 6000 avec des autres
NVIDIAQuadro 6000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTS 160M
NVIDIAQuadro 6000 vs
ATIRadeon HD 4770
NVIDIAQuadro 6000 vs
ATIRadeon HD 5870
NVIDIAQuadro 6000 vs
AMDRadeon HD 6970M
NVIDIAQuadro 6000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 590
NVIDIAQuadro 6000 vs
NVIDIAQuadro K5100M
