NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 versus NVIDIA Quadro 6000
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 and NVIDIA Quadro 6000 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 11 mois plus tard
- Environ 28% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 732 MHz versus 574 MHz
- Environ 28% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 41.0 GTexel / s versus 32.1 GTexel / s
- Environ 28% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,311.7 gflops versus 1,027.7 gflops
- Environ 27% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 3800 MHz versus 2988 MHz
- Environ 41% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 34.324 versus 24.377
- Environ 49% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1181.463 versus 793.755
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.978 versus 2.66
- Environ 67% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 58.37 versus 34.891
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 121.575 versus 90.839
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4590 versus 3501
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4590 versus 3501
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 29 November 2011 versus 10 December 2010 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 732 MHz versus 574 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 41.0 GTexel / s versus 32.1 GTexel / s |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,311.7 gflops versus 1,027.7 gflops |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 3800 MHz versus 2988 MHz |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 34.324 versus 24.377 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1181.463 versus 793.755 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.978 versus 2.66 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 58.37 versus 34.891 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 121.575 versus 90.839 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4590 versus 3501 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4590 versus 3501 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro 6000
- Environ 3% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 204 Watt versus 210 Watt
- 4.8x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 6 GB versus 1280 MB
- Environ 73% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3689 versus 2133
- Environ 73% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3689 versus 2133
| Caractéristiques | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 204 Watt versus 210 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 6 GB versus 1280 MB |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3689 versus 2133 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3335 versus 3333 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3689 versus 2133 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3335 versus 3333 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 6000
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 | NVIDIA Quadro 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 34.324 | 24.377 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1181.463 | 793.755 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.978 | 2.66 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 58.37 | 34.891 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 121.575 | 90.839 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4590 | 3501 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2133 | 3689 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3333 | 3335 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4590 | 3501 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2133 | 3689 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3333 | 3335 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4197 | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2704 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 455 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9850 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 | NVIDIA Quadro 6000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Fermi |
| Nom de code | GF110 | GF100 |
| Date de sortie | 29 November 2011 | 10 December 2010 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $289 | $4,399 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 766 | 769 |
| Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
| Prix maintenant | $332.21 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 12.86 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse du noyau | 732 MHz | 574 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,311.7 gflops | 1,027.7 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 448 | 448 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 41.0 GTexel / s | 32.1 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 210 Watt | 204 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 3,000 million | 3,100 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 267 mm | 248 mm |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 2x 6-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 1280 MB | 6 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 152.0 GB / s | 143.4 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 320 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 3800 MHz | 2988 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 vs
ATIMobility FireGL V3200
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 vs
NVIDIAQuadro 6000
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 590
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 vs
NVIDIATesla C2075
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 vs
AMDRadeon R9 M470
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 vs
AMDRadeon R7 450 OEM
