NVIDIA Quadro K2200 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro K2200 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro K2200
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 7 mois plus tard
- Environ 43% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1046 MHz versus 732 MHz
- Environ 2% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 44.96 GTexel / s versus 43.92 GTexel / s
- Environ 33% de pipelines plus haut: 640 versus 480
- Environ 2% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,439 gflops versus 1,405 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 28 nm versus 40 nm
- 3.2x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 68 Watt versus 219 Watt
- 3.2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 4 GB versus 1280 MB
- Environ 32% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 5012 MHz versus 3800 MHz
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 40.695 versus 36.499
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 165.39 versus 123.354
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 22 July 2014 versus 7 December 2010 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1046 MHz versus 732 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 44.96 GTexel / s versus 43.92 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 640 versus 480 |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,439 gflops versus 1,405 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm versus 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 68 Watt versus 219 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 1280 MB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5012 MHz versus 3800 MHz |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 40.695 versus 36.499 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 165.39 versus 123.354 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 674.215 versus 588.094
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.967 versus 3.205
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 36.208 versus 30.455
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5405 versus 4921
- 2.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3705 versus 1577
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 versus 1671
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5405 versus 4921
- 2.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3705 versus 1577
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 versus 1671
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 674.215 versus 588.094 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.967 versus 3.205 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 36.208 versus 30.455 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5405 versus 4921 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3705 versus 1577 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 versus 1671 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5405 versus 4921 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3705 versus 1577 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 versus 1671 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K2200
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA Quadro K2200 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3550 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 545 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 12020 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 40.695 | 36.499 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 588.094 | 674.215 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.205 | 3.967 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.455 | 36.208 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 165.39 | 123.354 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4921 | 5405 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1577 | 3705 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1671 | 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4921 | 5405 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1577 | 3705 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1671 | 3357 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1193 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA Quadro K2200 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell | Fermi 2.0 |
| Nom de code | GM107 | GF110 |
| Date de sortie | 22 July 2014 | 7 December 2010 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $395.75 | $349 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 804 | 807 |
| Prix maintenant | $343.99 | |
| Genre | Workstation | Desktop |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 13.01 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1124 MHz | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1046 MHz | 732 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,439 gflops | 1,405 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 640 | 480 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 44.96 GTexel / s | 43.92 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 68 Watt | 219 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 1,870 million | 3,000 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 202 mm | 267 mm |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 2x 6-pin |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | 1280 MB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 80.19 GB / s | 152.0 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 320 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5012 MHz | 3800 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA Quadro K2200 avec des autres
NVIDIAQuadro K2200 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 470
NVIDIAQuadro K2200 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2
NVIDIAQuadro K2200 vs
AMDRadeon HD 6450A
NVIDIAQuadro K2200 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7450M
NVIDIAQuadro K2200 vs
NVIDIAQuadro K5000M
NVIDIAQuadro K2200 vs
NVIDIATesla K80m
