NVIDIA Quadro K2200 versus NVIDIA Quadro K4200
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro K2200 and NVIDIA Quadro K4200 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro K2200
- Environ 36% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1046 MHz versus 771 MHz
- Environ 43% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1124 MHz versus 784 MHz
- Environ 59% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 68 Watt versus 108 Watt
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 548 versus 498
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 40.695 versus 33.016
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.205 versus 2.73
- 2.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 166.26 versus 70.194
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1046 MHz versus 771 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1124 MHz versus 784 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 68 Watt versus 108 Watt |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 548 versus 498 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 40.695 versus 33.016 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.205 versus 2.73 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 166.26 versus 70.194 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro K4200
- Environ 95% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 87.81 GTexel / s versus 44.96 GTexel / s
- 2.1x plus de pipelines: 1344 versus 640
- Environ 46% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2,107 gflops versus 1,439 gflops
- Environ 8% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 5400 MHz versus 5012 MHz
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 4340 versus 3572
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 12321 versus 12020
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 736.063 versus 588.094
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 31.588 versus 30.455
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6373 versus 4921
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3382 versus 1577
- Environ 98% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3311 versus 1671
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6373 versus 4921
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3382 versus 1577
- Environ 98% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3311 versus 1671
Caractéristiques | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 87.81 GTexel / s versus 44.96 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1344 versus 640 |
Performance á point flottant | 2,107 gflops versus 1,439 gflops |
Vitesse de mémoire | 5400 MHz versus 5012 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4340 versus 3572 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 12321 versus 12020 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 736.063 versus 588.094 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 31.588 versus 30.455 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6373 versus 4921 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3382 versus 1577 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3311 versus 1671 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6373 versus 4921 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3382 versus 1577 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3311 versus 1671 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K2200
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K4200
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA Quadro K2200 | NVIDIA Quadro K4200 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3572 | 4340 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 548 | 498 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 12020 | 12321 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 40.695 | 33.016 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 588.094 | 736.063 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.205 | 2.73 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.455 | 31.588 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 166.26 | 70.194 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4921 | 6373 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1577 | 3382 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1671 | 3311 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4921 | 6373 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1577 | 3382 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1671 | 3311 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1193 | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA Quadro K2200 | NVIDIA Quadro K4200 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | Kepler |
Nom de code | GM107 | GK104 |
Date de sortie | 22 July 2014 | 22 July 2014 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $395.75 | $854.99 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 787 | 681 |
Prix maintenant | $343.99 | $446.99 |
Genre | Workstation | Workstation |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 13.01 | 11.92 |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1124 MHz | 784 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1046 MHz | 771 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 1,439 gflops | 2,107 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 640 | 1344 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 44.96 GTexel / s | 87.81 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 68 Watt | 108 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 1,870 million | 3,540 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Longeur | 202 mm | 241 mm |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 1x 6-pin |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 80.19 GB / s | 172.8 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 5012 MHz | 5400 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |