NVIDIA Quadro K420 versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro K420 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro K420
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 8 mois plus tard
- Environ 22% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 41 Watt versus 50 Watt
- 29.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1245 versus 42
- 10.9x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 598 versus 55
- 17.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1241 versus 72.2
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 22 July 2014 versus 8 November 2013 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 41 Watt versus 50 Watt |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1245 versus 42 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 598 versus 55 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1241 versus 72.2 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition
- Environ 6% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 926 MHz versus 876 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 29.63 GTexel / s versus 14.02 GTexel / s
- 2x plus de pipelines: 384 versus 192
- 2.1x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 711.2 gflops versus 336.4 gflops
- 2048x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 2 GB versus 1 GB / 2 GB
- 2.8x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 5016 MHz versus 1782 MHz
- Environ 74% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 10.451 versus 6
- Environ 99% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 370.814 versus 186.605
- 2.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.075 versus 0.433
- 2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 20.902 versus 10.365
- Environ 27% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 22.557 versus 17.75
- Environ 99% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2483 versus 1245
- 5.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3406 versus 598
- 3.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 4045 versus 1241
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 926 MHz versus 876 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 29.63 GTexel / s versus 14.02 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 384 versus 192 |
| Performance á point flottant | 711.2 gflops versus 336.4 gflops |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 2 GB versus 1 GB / 2 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5016 MHz versus 1782 MHz |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 10.451 versus 6 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 370.814 versus 186.605 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.075 versus 0.433 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 20.902 versus 10.365 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 22.557 versus 17.75 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2483 versus 1245 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3406 versus 598 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4045 versus 1241 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K420
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA Quadro K420 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 740 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 283 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 1847 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6 | 10.451 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 186.605 | 370.814 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.433 | 1.075 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 10.365 | 20.902 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 17.75 | 22.557 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1245 | 2483 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 598 | 3406 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1241 | 4045 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1245 | 42 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 598 | 55 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1241 | 72.2 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA Quadro K420 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
| Nom de code | GK107 | GK107 |
| Date de sortie | 22 July 2014 | 8 November 2013 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $96.67 | |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1457 | 1458 |
| Prix maintenant | $89.99 | |
| Genre | Workstation | Desktop |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 10.27 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse du noyau | 876 MHz | 926 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 336.4 gflops | 711.2 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 192 | 384 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 14.02 GTexel / s | 29.63 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 41 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 1,270 million | 1,270 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | DVI-I DP, 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Nombre d’écrans á la fois | 4 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 160 mm | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
| Largeur | 1" (2.5 cm) | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 1 GB / 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1782 MHz | 5016 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | 128 Bit | GDDR5 |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 80.26 GB / s | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision Pro | ||
| Mosaic | ||
| nView Desktop Management | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA Quadro K420 avec des autres
NVIDIAQuadro K420 vs
ATIMobility FireGL 7800
NVIDIAQuadro K420 vs
NVIDIAQuadro 410
NVIDIAQuadro K420 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 735M
NVIDIAQuadro K420 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 750M Mac Edition
NVIDIAQuadro K420 vs
IntelHD Graphics 5300
NVIDIAQuadro K420 vs
IntelIris Xe Graphics 80EU (Alder Lake)
