NVIDIA Quadro K4200 versus NVIDIA Quadro K5000
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro K4200 and NVIDIA Quadro K5000 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro K4200
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 11 mois plus tard
- Environ 9% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 771 MHz versus 706 MHz
- Environ 13% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 108 Watt versus 122 Watt
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 4327 versus 3994
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 503 versus 432
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 12186 versus 11459
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 33.016 versus 31.318
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 736.063 versus 681.141
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 70.194 versus 67.311
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6373 versus 6288
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6373 versus 6288
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 22 July 2014 versus 17 August 2012 |
Vitesse du noyau | 771 MHz versus 706 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 108 Watt versus 122 Watt |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4327 versus 3994 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 503 versus 432 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 12186 versus 11459 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 33.016 versus 31.318 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 736.063 versus 681.141 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 70.194 versus 67.311 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6373 versus 6288 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6373 versus 6288 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro K5000
- Environ 3% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 90.37 GTexel / s versus 87.81 GTexel / s
- Environ 14% de pipelines plus haut: 1536 versus 1344
- Environ 3% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2,169 gflops versus 2,107 gflops
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.062 versus 2.73
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 32.922 versus 31.588
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3680 versus 3382
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3352 versus 3311
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3680 versus 3382
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3352 versus 3311
Caractéristiques | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 90.37 GTexel / s versus 87.81 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1536 versus 1344 |
Performance á point flottant | 2,169 gflops versus 2,107 gflops |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.062 versus 2.73 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 32.922 versus 31.588 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3680 versus 3382 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 versus 3311 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3680 versus 3382 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 versus 3311 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K4200
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K5000
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA Quadro K4200 | NVIDIA Quadro K5000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4327 | 3994 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 503 | 432 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 12186 | 11459 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 33.016 | 31.318 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 736.063 | 681.141 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.73 | 3.062 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 31.588 | 32.922 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 70.194 | 67.311 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6373 | 6288 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3382 | 3680 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3311 | 3352 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6373 | 6288 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3382 | 3680 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3311 | 3352 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | 1351 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA Quadro K4200 | NVIDIA Quadro K5000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
Nom de code | GK104 | GK104 |
Date de sortie | 22 July 2014 | 17 August 2012 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $854.99 | $2,499 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 702 | 705 |
Prix maintenant | $446.99 | $1,950 |
Genre | Workstation | Workstation |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 11.92 | 2.47 |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 784 MHz | |
Vitesse du noyau | 771 MHz | 706 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 2,107 gflops | 2,169 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 1344 | 1536 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 87.81 GTexel / s | 90.37 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 108 Watt | 122 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 3,540 million | 3,540 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Longeur | 241 mm | 267 mm |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin | 1x 6-pin |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 172.8 GB / s | 172.8 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 5400 MHz | 5400 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |