NVIDIA Quadro K5000M versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro K5000M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro K5000M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 7 mois plus tard
- Environ 53% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 67.31 GTexel / s versus 43.92 GTexel / s
- 2.8x plus de pipelines: 1344 versus 480
- Environ 15% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,615 gflops versus 1,405 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 28 nm versus 40 nm
- 2.2x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 100 Watt versus 219 Watt
- 3.2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 4 GB versus 1280 MB
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 7 August 2012 versus 7 December 2010 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 67.31 GTexel / s versus 43.92 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1344 versus 480 |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,615 gflops versus 1,405 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm versus 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt versus 219 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 1280 MB |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3712 versus 3705 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3712 versus 3705 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2
- Environ 22% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 732 MHz versus 601 MHz
- Environ 27% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 3800 MHz versus 3000 MHz
- Environ 48% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 36.499 versus 24.713
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 708.853 versus 685.1
- Environ 81% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.967 versus 2.189
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 36.208 versus 28.929
- Environ 80% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 123.354 versus 68.712
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5405 versus 4825
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5405 versus 4825
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 732 MHz versus 601 MHz |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 3800 MHz versus 3000 MHz |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 36.499 versus 24.713 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 708.853 versus 685.1 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.967 versus 2.189 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 36.208 versus 28.929 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 123.354 versus 68.712 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5405 versus 4825 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 versus 3353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5405 versus 4825 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 versus 3353 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K5000M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA Quadro K5000M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2806 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 361 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5107 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 24.713 | 36.499 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 685.1 | 708.853 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.189 | 3.967 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 28.929 | 36.208 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 68.712 | 123.354 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4825 | 5405 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3712 | 3705 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4825 | 5405 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3712 | 3705 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 3357 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA Quadro K5000M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | Fermi 2.0 |
| Nom de code | GK104 | GF110 |
| Date de sortie | 7 August 2012 | 7 December 2010 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $329.99 | $349 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 788 | 789 |
| Prix maintenant | $391 | |
| Genre | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 8.47 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse du noyau | 601 MHz | 732 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,615 gflops | 1,405 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 1344 | 480 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 67.31 GTexel / s | 43.92 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 219 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 3,540 million | 3,000 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Taille du laptop | large | |
| Longeur | 267 mm | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 2x 6-pin | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | 1280 MB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 96 GB / s | 152.0 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | 320 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 3000 MHz | 3800 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA Quadro K5000M avec des autres
NVIDIAQuadro K5000M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTS 160M
NVIDIAQuadro K5000M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 470
NVIDIAQuadro K5000M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2
NVIDIAQuadro K5000M vs
NVIDIAQuadro K2200
NVIDIAQuadro K5000M vs
AMDRadeon Pro 450
NVIDIAQuadro K5000M vs
NVIDIAQuadro P500
