NVIDIA Quadro K5200 versus AMD Radeon HD 7870 XT
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro K5200 and AMD Radeon HD 7870 XT pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro K5200
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 8 mois plus tard
- Environ 58% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 148.0 GTexel / s versus 93.6 GTexel / s
- Environ 50% de pipelines plus haut: 2304 versus 1536
- Environ 19% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 3,553 gflops versus 2,995 gflops
- Environ 23% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 150 Watt versus 185 Watt
- 4x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 8 GB versus 2 GB
- Environ 36% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 6097 versus 4470
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1278.433 versus 1230.47
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5946 versus 2810
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3708 versus 3264
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5946 versus 2810
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3708 versus 3264
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 22 July 2014 versus 19 November 2012 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 148.0 GTexel / s versus 93.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2304 versus 1536 |
Performance á point flottant | 3,553 gflops versus 2,995 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt versus 185 Watt |
Taille de mémore maximale | 8 GB versus 2 GB |
Vitesse de mémoire | 6008 MHz versus 6000 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6097 versus 4470 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1278.433 versus 1230.47 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5946 versus 2810 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3708 versus 3264 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5946 versus 2810 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3708 versus 3264 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 7870 XT
- Environ 39% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 925 MHz versus 667 MHz
- Environ 26% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 975 MHz versus 771 MHz
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 661 versus 548
- Environ 39% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 65.399 versus 47.147
- Environ 59% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 6.371 versus 3.996
- Environ 57% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 78.519 versus 50.08
- 3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 345.793 versus 115.307
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 925 MHz versus 667 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 975 MHz versus 771 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 661 versus 548 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 65.399 versus 47.147 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.371 versus 3.996 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 78.519 versus 50.08 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 345.793 versus 115.307 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 versus 3353 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 versus 3353 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K5200
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7870 XT
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA Quadro K5200 | AMD Radeon HD 7870 XT |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6097 | 4470 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 548 | 661 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 19262 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 47.147 | 65.399 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1278.433 | 1230.47 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.996 | 6.371 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 50.08 | 78.519 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 115.307 | 345.793 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5946 | 2810 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3708 | 3264 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 3354 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5946 | 2810 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3708 | 3264 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 3354 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1745 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA Quadro K5200 | AMD Radeon HD 7870 XT | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
Nom de code | GK110B | Tahiti |
Date de sortie | 22 July 2014 | 19 November 2012 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $1,699.74 | $270 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 538 | 539 |
Prix maintenant | $523.66 | |
Genre | Workstation | Desktop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 14.51 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 771 MHz | 975 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 667 MHz | 925 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 3,553 gflops | 2,995 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 2304 | 1536 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 148.0 GTexel / s | 93.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 185 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 7,080 million | 4,313 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 2x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 267 mm | 267 mm |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin | 2x 6-pin |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 8 GB | 2 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 192.3 GB / s | 192.0 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 6008 MHz | 6000 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |