NVIDIA GeForce GT 820M versus NVIDIA Quadro K600
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GT 820M and NVIDIA Quadro K600 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 820M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 8 mois plus tard
- 2.7x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 41 Watt
- Environ 1% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 1800 MHz versus 1782 MHz
- Environ 37% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 2498 versus 1822
- Environ 36% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 161.29 versus 118.389
- Environ 39% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.55 versus 0.396
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 11.858 versus 7.921
- Environ 89% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 17.753 versus 9.393
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1263 versus 1227
- Environ 42% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2479 versus 1745
- Environ 47% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3327 versus 2261
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1263 versus 1227
- Environ 42% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2479 versus 1745
- Environ 47% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3327 versus 2261
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 27 November 2013 versus 1 March 2013 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 41 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz versus 1782 MHz |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2498 versus 1822 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 161.29 versus 118.389 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.55 versus 0.396 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 11.858 versus 7.921 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 17.753 versus 9.393 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1263 versus 1227 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2479 versus 1745 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3327 versus 2261 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1263 versus 1227 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2479 versus 1745 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3327 versus 2261 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro K600
- Environ 13% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 876 MHz versus 775 MHz
- Environ 13% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 14.02 GTexel / s versus 12.4 GTexel / s
- 2x plus de pipelines: 192 versus 96
- Environ 13% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 336.4 gflops versus 297.6 gflops
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 734 versus 560
- Environ 88% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 277 versus 147
- 2.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 6.367 versus 2.692
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 876 MHz versus 775 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 14.02 GTexel / s versus 12.4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 192 versus 96 |
Performance á point flottant | 336.4 gflops versus 297.6 gflops |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 734 versus 560 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 277 versus 147 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.367 versus 2.692 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 820M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K600
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GT 820M | NVIDIA Quadro K600 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 560 | 734 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 147 | 277 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2498 | 1822 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.692 | 6.367 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 161.29 | 118.389 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.55 | 0.396 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 11.858 | 7.921 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 17.753 | 9.393 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1263 | 1227 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2479 | 1745 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3327 | 2261 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1263 | 1227 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2479 | 1745 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3327 | 2261 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GT 820M | NVIDIA Quadro K600 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Kepler |
Nom de code | GF117 | GK107 |
Date de sortie | 27 November 2013 | 1 March 2013 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1368 | 1371 |
Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $199 | |
Prix maintenant | $78.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 11.66 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse du noyau | 775 MHz | 876 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 297.6 gflops | 336.4 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 96 | 192 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 12.4 GTexel / s | 14.02 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 41 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 585 million | 1,270 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Longeur | 160 mm | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 1 GB | 1 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 14.4 GB / s | 28.51 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz | 1782 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | DDR3 |