NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile versus NVIDIA GRID K220Q
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile and NVIDIA GRID K220Q pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 6 mois plus tard
- Environ 47% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1093 MHz versus 745 MHz
- 5x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 45 Watt versus 225 Watt
- 8x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 4 GB versus 512 MB
- 3.5x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 3217 versus 912
- 5.9x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4941 versus 833
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2645 versus 2128
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 versus 2660
- 5.9x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4941 versus 833
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2645 versus 2128
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 versus 2660
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 11 January 2017 versus 2 July 2014 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1093 MHz versus 745 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt versus 225 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 512 MB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5012 MHz versus 5000 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3217 versus 912 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4941 versus 833 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2645 versus 2128 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 versus 2660 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4941 versus 833 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2645 versus 2128 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 versus 2660 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GRID K220Q
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 95.36 GTexel / s versus 43.72 GTexel / s
- 2.4x plus de pipelines: 1536 versus 640
- Environ 64% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2,289 gflops versus 1,399 gflops
- Environ 73% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 539 versus 312
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 95.36 GTexel / s versus 43.72 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1536 versus 640 |
| Performance á point flottant | 2,289 gflops versus 1,399 gflops |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 539 versus 312 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GRID K220Q
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile | NVIDIA GRID K220Q |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3217 | 912 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 312 | 539 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 10582 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 52.821 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 793.297 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.631 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 48.966 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 163.204 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4941 | 833 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2645 | 2128 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 2660 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4941 | 833 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2645 | 2128 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 2660 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile | NVIDIA GRID K220Q | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell | Kepler |
| Nom de code | GM107 | GK104 |
| Date de sortie | 11 January 2017 | 2 July 2014 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 759 | 760 |
| Genre | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $469 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse du noyau | 1093 MHz | 745 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,399 gflops | 2,289 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 640 | 1536 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 43.72 GTexel / s | 95.36 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 1,870 million | 3,540 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | 512 MB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 80.19 GB / s | 160.0 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5012 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile avec des autres
NVIDIAQuadro M1200 Mobile vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 3450
NVIDIAQuadro M1200 Mobile vs
NVIDIAQuadro K5100M
NVIDIAQuadro M1200 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGRID K220Q
NVIDIAQuadro M1200 Mobile vs
NVIDIAQuadro P520
NVIDIAQuadro M1200 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce MX330
NVIDIAQuadro M1200 Mobile vs
NVIDIAT600
