NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile versus NVIDIA Quadro K5100M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile and NVIDIA Quadro K5100M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 5 mois plus tard
- Environ 42% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1093 MHz versus 771 MHz
- 2.2x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 45 Watt versus 100 Watt
- Environ 39% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 5012 MHz versus 3600 MHz
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 3228 versus 3211
- 8.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 52.821 versus 5.972
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 793.297 versus 355.305
- 3.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.631 versus 1.022
- 3.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 48.966 versus 15.706
- 4.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 163.204 versus 34.772
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 11 January 2017 versus 23 July 2013 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1093 MHz versus 771 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt versus 100 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 5012 MHz versus 3600 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3228 versus 3211 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 52.821 versus 5.972 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 793.297 versus 355.305 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.631 versus 1.022 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 48.966 versus 15.706 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 163.204 versus 34.772 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro K5100M
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 98.69 GTexel / s versus 43.72 GTexel / s
- 2.4x plus de pipelines: 1536 versus 640
- Environ 69% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2,369 gflops versus 1,399 gflops
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 8 GB versus 4 GB
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 349 versus 316
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 11427 versus 10582
- Environ 37% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6747 versus 4941
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 versus 2645
- Environ 37% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6747 versus 4941
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 versus 2645
Caractéristiques | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 98.69 GTexel / s versus 43.72 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1536 versus 640 |
Performance á point flottant | 2,369 gflops versus 1,399 gflops |
Taille de mémore maximale | 8 GB versus 4 GB |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 349 versus 316 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11427 versus 10582 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6747 versus 4941 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 versus 2645 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3362 versus 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6747 versus 4941 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 versus 2645 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3362 versus 3359 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K5100M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile | NVIDIA Quadro K5100M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3228 | 3211 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 316 | 349 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 10582 | 11427 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 52.821 | 5.972 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 793.297 | 355.305 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.631 | 1.022 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 48.966 | 15.706 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 163.204 | 34.772 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4941 | 6747 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2645 | 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3362 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4941 | 6747 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2645 | 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3362 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile | NVIDIA Quadro K5100M | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | Kepler |
Nom de code | GM107 | GK104 |
Date de sortie | 11 January 2017 | 23 July 2013 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 775 | 778 |
Genre | Mobile workstation | Mobile workstation |
Prix maintenant | $309.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 13.80 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse du noyau | 1093 MHz | 771 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 1,399 gflops | 2,369 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 640 | 1536 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 43.72 GTexel / s | 98.69 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | 100 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 1,870 million | 3,540 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | MXM-B (3.0) |
Taille du laptop | large | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 4 GB | 8 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 80.19 GB / s | 115.2 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 5012 MHz | 3600 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision Pro | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Display Management | ||
Optimus |