NVIDIA Quadro M3000M versus AMD Radeon HD 7970
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro M3000M and AMD Radeon HD 7970 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 7 mois plus tard
- 4x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 75 Watt versus 300 Watt
- Environ 33% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 4 GB versus 3 GB
- 3.6x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 5012 MHz versus 1375 MHz
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 18 August 2015 versus 22 December 2011 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt versus 300 Watt |
Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 3 GB |
Vitesse de mémoire | 5012 MHz versus 1375 MHz |
Référence | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3720 versus 3704 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 versus 3350 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3720 versus 3704 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 versus 3350 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 7970
- Environ 76% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 118.4 GTexel / s versus 67.2 GTexel / s
- 2x plus de pipelines: 2048 versus 1,024
- Environ 76% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 3,789 gflops versus 2,150 gflops
- 2.1x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 34541 versus 16615
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 84.413 versus 82.563
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1390.592 versus 1266.506
- Environ 49% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 7.336 versus 4.91
- Environ 44% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 101.929 versus 70.779
- Environ 91% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 481.76 versus 252.607
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9448 versus 7779
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9448 versus 7779
Caractéristiques | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 118.4 GTexel / s versus 67.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2048 versus 1,024 |
Performance á point flottant | 3,789 gflops versus 2,150 gflops |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 34541 versus 16615 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 84.413 versus 82.563 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1390.592 versus 1266.506 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.336 versus 4.91 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 101.929 versus 70.779 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 481.76 versus 252.607 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9448 versus 7779 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9448 versus 7779 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7970
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA Quadro M3000M | AMD Radeon HD 7970 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5650 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 418 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 16615 | 34541 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 82.563 | 84.413 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1266.506 | 1390.592 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.91 | 7.336 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 70.779 | 101.929 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 252.607 | 481.76 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7779 | 9448 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3720 | 3704 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | 3350 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7779 | 9448 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3720 | 3704 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | 3350 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2276 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA Quadro M3000M | AMD Radeon HD 7970 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Nom de code | GM204 | Tahiti |
Date de sortie | 18 August 2015 | 22 December 2011 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 494 | 492 |
Genre | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Conception | AMD Radeon HD 7000 Series | |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $549 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse du noyau | 1050 MHz | |
Performance á point flottant | 2,150 gflops | 3,789 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 1,024 | 2048 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 67.2 GTexel / s | 118.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 300 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 5,200 million | 4,313 million |
Vitesse augmenté | 925 MHz | |
Stream Processors | 2048 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Taille du laptop | large | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Soutien de bus | PCIe 2.1 x16 | |
Longeur | 274 mm | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 | 11 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 5.0 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 4 GB | 3 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 160 GB / s | 264 GB/s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | 384 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 5012 MHz | 1375 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision Pro | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Display Management | ||
Optimus | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
CrossFire | ||
FreeSync |