NVIDIA Quadro P2200 versus NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro P2200 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro P2200
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 8 mois plus tard
- 3.3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 75 Watt versus 250 Watt
Date de sortie | 10 June 2019 versus 20 September 2018 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt versus 250 Watt |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
- Environ 35% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1350 MHz versus 1000 MHz
- Environ 3% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1545 MHz versus 1493 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 12 nm versus 16 nm
- 2.3x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 21601 versus 9372
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 928 versus 892
- 4.2x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 134929 versus 32343
- 3.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 394.035 versus 121.124
- 2.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 5461.22 versus 1958.592
- 4.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 41.104 versus 8.452
- Environ 44% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 174.185 versus 120.742
- 3.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1987.605 versus 510.941
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 23659 versus 11437
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 versus 1676
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 23659 versus 11437
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 versus 1676
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3537 versus 3404
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1350 MHz versus 1000 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1545 MHz versus 1493 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm versus 16 nm |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 21601 versus 9372 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 928 versus 892 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 134929 versus 32343 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 394.035 versus 121.124 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 5461.22 versus 1958.592 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 41.104 versus 8.452 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 174.185 versus 120.742 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1987.605 versus 510.941 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 23659 versus 11437 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 versus 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 versus 1676 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 23659 versus 11437 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 versus 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 versus 1676 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3537 versus 3404 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P2200
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA Quadro P2200 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9372 | 21601 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 892 | 928 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 32343 | 134929 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 121.124 | 394.035 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1958.592 | 5461.22 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.452 | 41.104 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 120.742 | 174.185 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 510.941 | 1987.605 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11437 | 23659 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1676 | 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11437 | 23659 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1676 | 3358 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3404 | 3537 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA Quadro P2200 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Turing |
Nom de code | GP106 | TU102 |
Date de sortie | 10 June 2019 | 20 September 2018 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 307 | 91 |
Genre | Workstation | Desktop |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $999 | |
Prix maintenant | $1,279.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 17.22 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1493 MHz | 1545 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1000 MHz | 1350 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 16 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 119.4 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 59.72 GFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.822 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 1280 | |
Pixel fill rate | 59.72 GPixel/s | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 119.4 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 250 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 4400 million | 18,600 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 4x DisplayPort | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 201 mm (7.9") | 267 mm |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 2x 8-pin |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 5 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 200.2 GB/s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 160 bit | |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5X | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz |