NVIDIA Quadro P2200 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro P2200 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro P2200
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 4 ans 0 mois plus tard
- Environ 39% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1493 MHz versus 1075 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 119.4 GTexel/s versus 176 billion / sec
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 16 nm versus 28 nm
- 3.3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 75 Watt versus 250 Watt
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 899 versus 853
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1958.592 versus 1722.98
- 3.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 120.742 versus 37.16
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11437 versus 10471
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 versus 3695
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11437 versus 10471
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 versus 3695
- 2.6x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3404 versus 1320
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 10 June 2019 versus 2 June 2015 |
Vitesse augmenté | 1493 MHz versus 1075 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 119.4 GTexel/s versus 176 billion / sec |
Processus de fabrication | 16 nm versus 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt versus 250 Watt |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 899 versus 853 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1958.592 versus 1722.98 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 120.742 versus 37.16 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11437 versus 10471 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 versus 3695 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11437 versus 10471 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 versus 3695 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3404 versus 1320 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
- 2.2x plus de pipelines: 2816 versus 1280
- Environ 20% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 6 GB versus 5 GB
- Environ 47% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 13783 versus 9353
- Environ 33% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 42988 versus 32372
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 145.843 versus 121.124
- Environ 38% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 11.661 versus 8.452
- Environ 54% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 788.464 versus 510.941
- Environ 99% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3338 versus 1676
- Environ 99% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3338 versus 1676
Caractéristiques | |
Pipelines | 2816 versus 1280 |
Taille de mémore maximale | 6 GB versus 5 GB |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13783 versus 9353 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 42988 versus 32372 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 145.843 versus 121.124 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 11.661 versus 8.452 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 788.464 versus 510.941 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3338 versus 1676 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3338 versus 1676 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P2200
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA Quadro P2200 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9353 | 13783 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 899 | 853 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 32372 | 42988 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 121.124 | 145.843 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1958.592 | 1722.98 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.452 | 11.661 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 120.742 | 37.16 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 510.941 | 788.464 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11437 | 10471 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3695 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1676 | 3338 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11437 | 10471 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3695 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1676 | 3338 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3404 | 1320 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA Quadro P2200 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Maxwell 2.0 |
Nom de code | GP106 | GM200 |
Date de sortie | 10 June 2019 | 2 June 2015 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 309 | 312 |
Genre | Workstation | Desktop |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $649 | |
Prix maintenant | $679.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 23.43 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1493 MHz | 1075 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1000 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 16 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 119.4 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 59.72 GFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.822 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 1280 | 2816 |
Pixel fill rate | 59.72 GPixel/s | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 119.4 GTexel/s | 176 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 250 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 4400 million | 8,000 million |
Noyaux CUDA | 2816 | |
Performance á point flottant | 6,060 gflops | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 4x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2 |
Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
HDCP | ||
Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 201 mm (7.9") | 10.5" (26.7 cm) |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 6-pin + 8-pin |
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
Options SLI | 4x | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 5 GB | 6 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 200.2 GB/s | 336.5 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 160 bit | 384 Bit |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5X | GDDR5 |
Vitesse de mémoire | 7.0 GB/s | |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive Vertical Sync | ||
CUDA | ||
GameStream | ||
GameWorks | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
GPU Boost | ||
SLI | ||
Surround |