NVIDIA Quadro P400 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro P400 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro P400
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 11 mois plus tard
- Environ 19% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1228 MHz versus 1033 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- Environ 83% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 30 Watt versus 55 Watt
- 2.2x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 4012 MHz versus 1800 MHz
- Environ 59% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2875 versus 1813
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3328 versus 3309
- Environ 59% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2875 versus 1813
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3328 versus 3309
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 7 February 2017 versus 18 February 2014 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1228 MHz versus 1033 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt versus 55 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 4012 MHz versus 1800 MHz |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2875 versus 1813 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3328 versus 3309 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2875 versus 1813 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3328 versus 3309 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM
- Environ 17% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 24.79 GTexel / s versus 21.25 GTexel / s
- Environ 50% de pipelines plus haut: 384 versus 256
- Environ 17% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 793.3 gflops versus 679.9 gflops
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 4 GB versus 2 GB
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 2145 versus 1637
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 474 versus 442
- 2x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 6139 versus 3053
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 24.117 versus 20.138
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 335.835 versus 318.72
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.651 versus 1.391
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 27.096 versus 24.886
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 97.126 versus 84.858
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2918 versus 2709
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2918 versus 2709
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 655 versus 617
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 24.79 GTexel / s versus 21.25 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 384 versus 256 |
| Performance á point flottant | 793.3 gflops versus 679.9 gflops |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 2 GB |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2145 versus 1637 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 474 versus 442 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 6139 versus 3053 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 24.117 versus 20.138 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 335.835 versus 318.72 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.651 versus 1.391 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 27.096 versus 24.886 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 97.126 versus 84.858 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2918 versus 2709 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2918 versus 2709 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 655 versus 617 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P400
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA Quadro P400 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1637 | 2145 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 442 | 474 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3053 | 6139 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 20.138 | 24.117 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 318.72 | 335.835 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.391 | 1.651 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.886 | 27.096 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 84.858 | 97.126 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2709 | 2918 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2875 | 1813 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3328 | 3309 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2709 | 2918 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2875 | 1813 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3328 | 3309 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 617 | 655 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA Quadro P400 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | Maxwell |
| Nom de code | GP107 | GM107 |
| Date de sortie | 7 February 2017 | 18 February 2014 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $119.99 | |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 992 | 994 |
| Prix maintenant | $119.99 | |
| Genre | Workstation | Desktop |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 18.70 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1252 MHz | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1228 MHz | 1033 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 679.9 gflops | 793.3 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 256 | 384 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 21.25 GTexel / s | 24.79 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | 55 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 3,300 million | 1,870 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 3x mini-DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 145 mm | 145 mm |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | None |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 32.1 GB / s | 28.8 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 4012 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA Quadro P400 avec des autres
NVIDIAQuadro P400 vs
NVIDIAGeForce4 MX 460
NVIDIAQuadro P400 vs
AMDFirePro M5950
NVIDIAQuadro P400 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 745 OEM
NVIDIAQuadro P400 vs
IntelIris Pro Graphics 580
NVIDIAQuadro P400 vs
AMDRadeon 535 Mobile
NVIDIAQuadro P400 vs
IntelArc A350M
