NVIDIA Quadro P4000 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro P4000 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop) pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro P4000
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 5 mois plus tard
- Environ 80% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 100 Watt versus 180 Watt
- 760.4x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 7604 MHz versus 10 GB/s
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 152.325 versus 150.103
- Environ 68% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 45.977 versus 27.417
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 6 February 2017 versus 15 August 2016 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt versus 180 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 7604 MHz versus 10 GB/s |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 152.325 versus 150.103 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 45.977 versus 27.417 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
- Environ 34% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1607 MHz versus 1202 MHz
- Environ 20% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1771 MHz versus 1480 MHz
- Environ 71% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 283.4 GTexel / s versus 165.8 GTexel / s
- Environ 43% de pipelines plus haut: 2560 versus 1792
- Environ 71% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 9,068 gflops versus 5,304 gflops
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 55514 versus 42289
- Environ 28% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2036.763 versus 1590.392
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 14.035 versus 11.365
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 819.934 versus 751.626
- Environ 32% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20151 versus 15267
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 4646 versus 3714
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 4195 versus 3358
- Environ 32% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20151 versus 15267
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 4646 versus 3714
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 4195 versus 3358
- Environ 48% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 7241 versus 4904
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1607 MHz versus 1202 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1771 MHz versus 1480 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 283.4 GTexel / s versus 165.8 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2560 versus 1792 |
| Performance á point flottant | 9,068 gflops versus 5,304 gflops |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 55514 versus 42289 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2036.763 versus 1590.392 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 14.035 versus 11.365 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 819.934 versus 751.626 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20151 versus 15267 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 4646 versus 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4195 versus 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20151 versus 15267 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 4646 versus 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4195 versus 3358 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7241 versus 4904 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P4000
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA Quadro P4000 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop) |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 11624 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 815 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 42289 | 55514 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 152.325 | 150.103 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1590.392 | 2036.763 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 11.365 | 14.035 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 45.977 | 27.417 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 751.626 | 819.934 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15267 | 20151 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | 4646 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 4195 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15267 | 20151 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | 4646 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 4195 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4904 | 7241 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA Quadro P4000 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop) | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | Pascal |
| Nom de code | GP104 | GP104 |
| Date de sortie | 6 February 2017 | 15 August 2016 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $815 | $499.99 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 286 | 287 |
| Prix maintenant | $799.99 | $439.99 |
| Genre | Workstation | Laptop |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 17.17 | 43.70 |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1480 MHz | 1771 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1202 MHz | 1607 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 5,304 gflops | 9,068 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 16 nm | 16 nm |
| Pipelines | 1792 | 2560 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 165.8 GTexel / s | 283.4 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 180 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 7,200 million | 7,200 million |
| Noyaux CUDA | 2560 | |
| Température maximale du GPU | 94 °C | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 4x DisplayPort | DP 1.42, HDMI 2.0b, DL-DVI |
| Display Port | 1.4 | |
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 241 mm | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin | |
| Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Taille du laptop | large | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 192 GB / s | 320 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 7604 MHz | 10 GB/s |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Stereo | ||
| Mosaic | ||
| nView Display Management | ||
| Optimus | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Ansel | ||
| CUDA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| Multi Monitor | ||
| Multi-Projection | ||
| ShadowWorks | ||
| SLI | ||
| Virtual Reality | ||
| VR Ready | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA Quadro P4000 avec des autres
NVIDIAQuadro P4000 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7750M
NVIDIAQuadro P4000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop)
NVIDIAQuadro P4000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
NVIDIAQuadro P4000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1060 Mobile 6 GB
NVIDIAQuadro P4000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 Ti
NVIDIAQuadro P4000 vs
AMDRadeon 550
