NVIDIA Quadro P620 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro P620 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro P620
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 0 mois plus tard
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 16 nm
- Environ 88% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 40 Watt versus 75 Watt
- Environ 70% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 549 versus 323
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 53.425 versus 24.676
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3881 versus 3687
- Environ 99% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6631 versus 3336
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3881 versus 3687
- Environ 99% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6631 versus 3336
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 1 February 2018 versus 1 February 2017 |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 16 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt versus 75 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 549 versus 323 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 53.425 versus 24.676 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3881 versus 3687 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6631 versus 3336 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3881 versus 3687 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6631 versus 3336 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
- Environ 18% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1493 MHz versus 1266 MHz
- Environ 20% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1620 MHz versus 1354 MHz
- Environ 67% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 77.76 GTexel / s versus 46.56 GTexel / s
- Environ 50% de pipelines plus haut: 768 versus 512
- Environ 67% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2,488 gflops versus 1,490 gflops
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 4 GB versus 2 GB
- Environ 40% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 7008 MHz versus 5012 MHz
- Environ 61% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 5918 versus 3670
- Environ 66% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 20732 versus 12475
- Environ 73% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 75.758 versus 43.877
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 843.503 versus 773.248
- Environ 65% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.071 versus 3.082
- Environ 63% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 301.168 versus 184.343
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8496 versus 3575
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8496 versus 3575
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1493 MHz versus 1266 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1620 MHz versus 1354 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 77.76 GTexel / s versus 46.56 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 768 versus 512 |
| Performance á point flottant | 2,488 gflops versus 1,490 gflops |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 2 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 7008 MHz versus 5012 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5918 versus 3670 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 20732 versus 12475 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 75.758 versus 43.877 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 843.503 versus 773.248 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.071 versus 3.082 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 301.168 versus 184.343 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8496 versus 3575 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8496 versus 3575 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P620
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA Quadro P620 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3670 | 5918 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 549 | 323 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 12475 | 20732 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 43.877 | 75.758 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 773.248 | 843.503 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.082 | 5.071 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 53.425 | 24.676 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 184.343 | 301.168 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3575 | 8496 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3881 | 3687 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6631 | 3336 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3575 | 8496 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3881 | 3687 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6631 | 3336 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2340 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA Quadro P620 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | Pascal |
| Nom de code | GP107 | GP106B |
| Date de sortie | 1 February 2018 | 1 February 2017 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 583 | 533 |
| Prix maintenant | $176.99 | |
| Genre | Workstation | Laptop |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 25.53 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1354 MHz | 1620 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1266 MHz | 1493 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,490 gflops | 2,488 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 16 nm |
| Pipelines | 512 | 768 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 46.56 GTexel / s | 77.76 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 3,300 million | 4,400 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 4x mini-DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 145 mm | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
| Taille du laptop | large | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 64.19 GB / s | 112.1 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5012 MHz | 7008 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| Multi Monitor | ||
| Multi-Projection | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA Quadro P620 avec des autres
NVIDIAQuadro P620 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 6500
NVIDIAQuadro P620 vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 4850
NVIDIAQuadro P620 vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 4830
NVIDIAQuadro P620 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)
NVIDIAQuadro P620 vs
NVIDIAQuadro M620 Mobile
NVIDIAQuadro P620 vs
AMDRadeon R9 350
