NVIDIA Quadro P620 versus NVIDIA Quadro K2200
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro P620 and NVIDIA Quadro K2200 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro P620
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 6 mois plus tard
- Environ 21% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1266 MHz versus 1046 MHz
- Environ 20% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1354 MHz versus 1124 MHz
- Environ 4% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 46.56 GTexel / s versus 44.96 GTexel / s
- Environ 4% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,490 gflops versus 1,439 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- Environ 70% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 40 Watt versus 68 Watt
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 3670 versus 3572
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 12475 versus 12020
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 43.877 versus 40.695
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 773.248 versus 588.094
- Environ 75% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 53.425 versus 30.455
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 184.343 versus 166.26
- 2.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3881 versus 1577
- 4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6631 versus 1671
- 2.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3881 versus 1577
- 4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6631 versus 1671
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 1 February 2018 versus 22 July 2014 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1266 MHz versus 1046 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1354 MHz versus 1124 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 46.56 GTexel / s versus 44.96 GTexel / s |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,490 gflops versus 1,439 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt versus 68 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3670 versus 3572 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 549 versus 548 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 12475 versus 12020 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 43.877 versus 40.695 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 773.248 versus 588.094 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 53.425 versus 30.455 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 184.343 versus 166.26 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3881 versus 1577 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6631 versus 1671 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3881 versus 1577 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6631 versus 1671 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro K2200
- Environ 25% de pipelines plus haut: 640 versus 512
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 4 GB versus 2 GB
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.205 versus 3.082
- Environ 38% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4921 versus 3575
- Environ 38% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4921 versus 3575
| Caractéristiques | |
| Pipelines | 640 versus 512 |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 2 GB |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.205 versus 3.082 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4921 versus 3575 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4921 versus 3575 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P620
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K2200
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA Quadro P620 | NVIDIA Quadro K2200 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3670 | 3572 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 549 | 548 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 12475 | 12020 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 43.877 | 40.695 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 773.248 | 588.094 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.082 | 3.205 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 53.425 | 30.455 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 184.343 | 166.26 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3575 | 4921 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3881 | 1577 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6631 | 1671 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3575 | 4921 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3881 | 1577 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6631 | 1671 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1193 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA Quadro P620 | NVIDIA Quadro K2200 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | Maxwell |
| Nom de code | GP107 | GM107 |
| Date de sortie | 1 February 2018 | 22 July 2014 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 583 | 787 |
| Prix maintenant | $176.99 | $343.99 |
| Genre | Workstation | Workstation |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 25.53 | 13.01 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $395.75 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1354 MHz | 1124 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1266 MHz | 1046 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,490 gflops | 1,439 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 512 | 640 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 46.56 GTexel / s | 44.96 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt | 68 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 3,300 million | 1,870 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 4x mini-DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 145 mm | 202 mm |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | None |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 64.19 GB / s | 80.19 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5012 MHz | 5012 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA Quadro P620 avec des autres
NVIDIAQuadro P620 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 6500
NVIDIAQuadro P620 vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 4850
NVIDIAQuadro P620 vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 4830
NVIDIAQuadro P620 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)
NVIDIAQuadro P620 vs
NVIDIAQuadro M620 Mobile
NVIDIAQuadro P620 vs
AMDRadeon R9 350
