NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q versus NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 mois plus tard
- Environ 92% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 60 Watt versus 115 Watt
| Date de sortie | 27 May 2019 versus 29 January 2019 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt versus 115 Watt |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
- 2x plus de vitesse du noyau: 1215 MHz versus 600 MHz
- Environ 19% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1440 MHz versus 1215 MHz
- Environ 48% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 12354 versus 8366
- Environ 75% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 601 versus 343
- Environ 83% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 18604 versus 10140
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8898 versus 3706
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8029 versus 3351
- Environ 83% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 18604 versus 10140
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8898 versus 3706
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8029 versus 3351
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1215 MHz versus 600 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1440 MHz versus 1215 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 12354 versus 8366 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 601 versus 343 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 18604 versus 10140 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8898 versus 3706 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8029 versus 3351 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 18604 versus 10140 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8898 versus 3706 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8029 versus 3351 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 8366 | 12354 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 343 | 601 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 68305 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 220.867 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2046.214 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.026 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 94.532 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 645.647 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10140 | 18604 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3706 | 8898 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | 8029 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10140 | 18604 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3706 | 8898 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 | 8029 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7453 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Turing |
| Nom de code | TU106 | TU106 |
| Date de sortie | 27 May 2019 | 29 January 2019 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 325 | 128 |
| Genre | Mobile workstation | Laptop |
| Prix maintenant | $489.99 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 49.06 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1215 MHz | 1440 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 600 MHz | 1215 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 175.0 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 11.20 TFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 5.599 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 2304 | 2304 |
| Pixel fill rate | 77.76 GPixel/s | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 175.0 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt | 115 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 10800 million | 10,800 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
| Largeur | IGP | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 6 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 448 GB/s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 256 Bit |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz | |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q avec des autres
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000 Max-Q vs
ATIRadeon X1950 CrossFire Edition
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000 Max-Q vs
ATIFirePro 2450 Multi-View
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAGRID K140Q
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000 Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega M GH
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAP102-100
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 3 GB
