NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 8 mois plus tard
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 222.5 GTexel/s versus 354.4 GTexel / s
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 12 nm versus 16 nm
- Environ 56% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 160 Watt versus 250 Watt
- Environ 27% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 85890 versus 67401
- Environ 37% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 282.628 versus 205.837
- Environ 41% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3403.106 versus 2406.499
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 24.719 versus 19.591
- 5.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 136.919 versus 25.833
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1010.818 versus 1002.573
- Environ 35% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20206 versus 15019
- Environ 35% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20206 versus 15019
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 13 November 2018 versus 10 March 2017 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 222.5 GTexel/s versus 354.4 GTexel / s |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm versus 16 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 160 Watt versus 250 Watt |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 85890 versus 67401 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 282.628 versus 205.837 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3403.106 versus 2406.499 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 24.719 versus 19.591 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 136.919 versus 25.833 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1010.818 versus 1002.573 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20206 versus 15019 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 versus 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20206 versus 15019 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 versus 3357 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)
- Environ 47% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1481 MHz versus 1005 MHz
- Environ 2% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1582 MHz versus 1545 MHz
- Environ 56% de pipelines plus haut: 3584 versus 2304
- Environ 38% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 11 GB versus 8 GB
- 6.8x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 11008 MHz versus 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective)
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 9873 versus 7856
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1481 MHz versus 1005 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1582 MHz versus 1545 MHz |
| Pipelines | 3584 versus 2304 |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 11 GB versus 8 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 11008 MHz versus 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective) |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 versus 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 versus 3714 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 9873 versus 7856 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 85890 | 67401 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 282.628 | 205.837 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3403.106 | 2406.499 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 24.719 | 19.591 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 136.919 | 25.833 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1010.818 | 1002.573 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20206 | 15019 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | 3716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20206 | 15019 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | 3716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3357 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7856 | 9873 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 18564 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 935 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
| Nom de code | TU104 | GP102 |
| Génération GCN | Quadro RTX | |
| Date de sortie | 13 November 2018 | 10 March 2017 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $899 | $699 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 206 | 207 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Prix maintenant | $826.98 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 27.48 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1545 MHz | 1582 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1005 MHz | 1481 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 16 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 222.5 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 14.24 TFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.119 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 2304 | 3584 |
| Pixel fill rate | 98.88 GPixel/s | |
| Render output units | 64 | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 222.5 GTexel/s | 354.4 GTexel / s |
| Texture Units | 144 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 160 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 13600 million | 11,800 million |
| Performance á point flottant | 11,340 gflops | |
| Température maximale du GPU | 91 °C | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 9.5 inches (241 mm) | 10.5" (26.7 cm) |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 8 GB | 11 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 416.0 GB/s | 484.4 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 352 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective) | 11008 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR5X |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Ansel | ||
| CUDA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| HDMI 2.0b | ||
| PCIe 3.0 | ||
| SLI | ||
| Virtual Reality | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 avec des autres
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 vs
AMDFirePro W9100
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 vs
AMDRadeon Vega Frontier Edition
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 vs
AMDRadeon PRO WX 9100
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 vs
AMDRadeon RX 5600 XT
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 vs
AMDRadeon 780M
