NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 versus AMD Radeon Pro Duo
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 and AMD Radeon Pro Duo pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 3 mois plus tard
- Environ 82% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1815 MHz versus 1000 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 12 nm versus 28 nm
- Environ 75% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 200 Watt versus 350 Watt
- 28x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 14000 MHz versus 500 MHz
- Environ 97% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 16069 versus 8137
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 750 versus 745
- Environ 95% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 105171 versus 53806
- Environ 60% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 226.447 versus 141.474
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4161.764 versus 3621.344
- Environ 94% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 25.476 versus 13.132
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 118.544 versus 112.973
- Environ 38% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1106.12 versus 799.933
- Environ 95% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19811 versus 10141
- Environ 95% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19811 versus 10141
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 13 August 2018 versus 26 April 2016 |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1815 MHz versus 1000 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 200 Watt versus 350 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz versus 500 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 16069 versus 8137 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 750 versus 745 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 105171 versus 53806 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 226.447 versus 141.474 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4161.764 versus 3621.344 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 25.476 versus 13.132 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 118.544 versus 112.973 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1106.12 versus 799.933 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19811 versus 10141 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 versus 3713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19811 versus 10141 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 versus 3713 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Pro Duo
- 11.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 38251 versus 3358
- 11.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 38251 versus 3358
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 38251 versus 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 38251 versus 3358 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro Duo
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 | AMD Radeon Pro Duo |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 16069 | 8137 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 750 | 745 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 105171 | 53806 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 226.447 | 141.474 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4161.764 | 3621.344 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 25.476 | 13.132 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 118.544 | 112.973 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1106.12 | 799.933 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19811 | 10141 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 | 3713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 38251 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19811 | 10141 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 | 3713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 38251 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 10685 | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 | AMD Radeon Pro Duo | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 3.0 |
| Nom de code | TU104 | Capsaicin |
| Date de sortie | 13 August 2018 | 26 April 2016 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $2,299 | $1,499 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 154 | 188 |
| Genre | Workstation | Workstation |
| Conception | reference | |
| Prix maintenant | $849 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 17.05 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1815 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1620 MHz | |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 200 Watt | 350 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 13,600 million | 8,900 million |
| Unités de Compute | 128 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 2x 8,192 gflops | |
| Pipelines | 2x 4096 | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 2x 256.0 GTexel / s billion / sec | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Nombre d’écrans Eyefinity | 6 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 267 mm | 277 mm |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | 3x 8-pin |
| Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | DirectX® 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz | 500 MHz |
| RAM maximale | 8 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 512 GB / s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 2x 4096 Bit | |
| Genre de mémoire | High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) | |
Technologies |
||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| Enduro | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| FRTC | ||
| HD3D | ||
| LiquidVR | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| TressFX | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 avec des autres
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 vs
NVIDIATesla V100 PCIe 32 GB
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 vs
AMDRadeon RX 5300
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 vs
AMDRadeon RX 6600M
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 vs
AMDRadeon RX 6600 XT
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 vs
AppleM1 Pro 14-core
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 vs
AMDRadeon 760M
