NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 5 mois plus tard
- Environ 12% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1770 MHz versus 1582 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 12 nm versus 16 nm
- Environ 27% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 14000 MHz versus 11008 MHz
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 18872 versus 18560
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 74179 versus 62702
- 2.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 488.989 versus 205.837
- 2.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 5451.006 versus 2406.499
- 2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 41.461 versus 19.591
- 5.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 153.677 versus 25.833
- Environ 53% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1534.582 versus 1002.573
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19571 versus 15019
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19571 versus 15019
- Environ 41% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 13943 versus 9870
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 13 August 2018 versus 10 March 2017 |
Vitesse augmenté | 1770 MHz versus 1582 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm versus 16 nm |
Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz versus 11008 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 18872 versus 18560 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 74179 versus 62702 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 488.989 versus 205.837 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 5451.006 versus 2406.499 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 41.461 versus 19.591 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 153.677 versus 25.833 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1534.582 versus 1002.573 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19571 versus 15019 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 versus 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19571 versus 15019 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 versus 3716 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 13943 versus 9870 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)
- Environ 3% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1481 MHz versus 1440 MHz
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 937 versus 791
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1481 MHz versus 1440 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 937 versus 791 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 18872 | 18560 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 791 | 937 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 74179 | 62702 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 488.989 | 205.837 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 5451.006 | 2406.499 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 41.461 | 19.591 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 153.677 | 25.833 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1534.582 | 1002.573 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19571 | 15019 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19571 | 15019 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 3357 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 13943 | 9870 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
Nom de code | TU102 | GP102 |
Date de sortie | 13 August 2018 | 10 March 2017 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $6,299 | $699 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 111 | 201 |
Genre | Workstation | Desktop |
Prix maintenant | $826.98 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 27.48 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1770 MHz | 1582 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1440 MHz | 1481 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 16 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 250 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 18,600 million | 11,800 million |
Performance á point flottant | 11,340 gflops | |
Température maximale du GPU | 91 °C | |
Pipelines | 3584 | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 354.4 GTexel / s | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 267 mm | 10.5" (26.7 cm) |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 2x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
||
Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz | 11008 MHz |
RAM maximale | 11 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 484.4 GB / s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 352 Bit | |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5X | |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Ansel | ||
CUDA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
HDMI 2.0b | ||
PCIe 3.0 | ||
SLI | ||
Virtual Reality |