NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 versus NVIDIA Quadro K510M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 and NVIDIA Quadro K510M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 5 ans 0 mois plus tard
- Environ 19% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1005 MHz versus 846 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 12 nm versus 28 nm
- 5.8x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 14000 MHz versus 2400 MHz
- 30.2x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 19370 versus 641
- Environ 97% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 869 versus 441
- 19.9x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 21578 versus 1087
- Environ 82% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3652 versus 2012
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3290 versus 3071
- 19.9x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 21578 versus 1087
- Environ 82% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3652 versus 2012
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3290 versus 3071
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 13 August 2018 versus 23 July 2013 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1005 MHz versus 846 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm versus 28 nm |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz versus 2400 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 19370 versus 641 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 869 versus 441 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 21578 versus 1087 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3652 versus 2012 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3290 versus 3071 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 21578 versus 1087 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3652 versus 2012 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3290 versus 3071 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro K510M
- 8.3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 30 Watt versus 250 Watt
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt versus 250 Watt |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K510M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 | NVIDIA Quadro K510M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 19370 | 641 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 869 | 441 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 137748 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 401.574 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6432.348 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 43.914 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 215.219 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2101.927 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 21578 | 1087 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3652 | 2012 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3290 | 3071 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 21578 | 1087 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3652 | 2012 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3290 | 3071 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 | NVIDIA Quadro K510M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Kepler 2.0 |
| Nom de code | TU102 | GK208 |
| Date de sortie | 13 August 2018 | 23 July 2013 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $9,999 | |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 103 | 835 |
| Genre | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1200 MHz | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1005 MHz | 846 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 30 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 18,600 million | 1270 Million |
| Performance á point flottant | 324.9 gflops | |
| Pipelines | 192 | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 13.54 GTexel / s | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | No outputs |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Longeur | 267 mm | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 2x 8-pin | |
| Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz | 2400 MHz |
| RAM maximale | 1 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 19.2 GB / s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision Pro | ||
| Mosaic | ||
| nView Display Management | ||
| Optimus | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 avec des autres
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 8000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 8000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3060 Ti
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 8000 vs
NVIDIARTX A4000
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 8000 vs
IntelArc A580
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 8000 vs
NVIDIARTX A3000 Mobile 12GB
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 8000 vs
NVIDIAA30
