NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 versus NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 and NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 1 mois plus tard
- 8x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 14000 MHz versus 1752 MHz
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 19370 versus 16235
- 2.1x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 869 versus 406
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 43.914 versus 41.826
- 2.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 215.219 versus 73.167
- Environ 68% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2101.927 versus 1253.829
- Environ 32% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 21578 versus 16337
- Environ 32% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 21578 versus 16337
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 13 August 2018 versus 21 June 2017 |
Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz versus 1752 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 19370 versus 16235 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 869 versus 406 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 43.914 versus 41.826 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 215.219 versus 73.167 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2101.927 versus 1253.829 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 21578 versus 16337 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 21578 versus 16337 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB
- Environ 31% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1312 MHz versus 1005 MHz
- Environ 28% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1530 MHz versus 1200 MHz
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 180318 versus 137748
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 500.053 versus 401.574
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 7209.392 versus 6432.348
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3719 versus 3652
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3360 versus 3290
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3719 versus 3652
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3360 versus 3290
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1312 MHz versus 1005 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1530 MHz versus 1200 MHz |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 180318 versus 137748 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 500.053 versus 401.574 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 7209.392 versus 6432.348 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 versus 3652 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 versus 3290 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 versus 3652 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 versus 3290 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 | NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 19370 | 16235 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 869 | 406 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 137748 | 180318 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 401.574 | 500.053 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6432.348 | 7209.392 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 43.914 | 41.826 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 215.219 | 73.167 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2101.927 | 1253.829 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 21578 | 16337 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3652 | 3719 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3290 | 3360 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 21578 | 16337 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3652 | 3719 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3290 | 3360 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 | NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Turing | Volta |
Nom de code | TU102 | GV100 |
Date de sortie | 13 August 2018 | 21 June 2017 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $9,999 | |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 103 | 135 |
Genre | Workstation | Workstation |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1200 MHz | 1530 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1005 MHz | 1312 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 12 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 250 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 18,600 million | 21,100 million |
Performance á point flottant | 14,029 gflops | |
Pipelines | 5120 | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 438.4 GTexel / s | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 267 mm | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 2x 8-pin | None |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz | 1752 MHz |
RAM maximale | 16 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 897.0 GB / s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 4096 Bit | |
Genre de mémoire | HBM2 |