NVIDIA Quadro T1000 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Xp
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro T1000 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Xp pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro T1000
- 5x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 50 Watt versus 250 Watt
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3718 versus 3698
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3718 versus 3698
Caractéristiques | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt versus 250 Watt |
Référence | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 versus 3698 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 versus 3343 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 versus 3698 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 versus 3343 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Xp
- Environ 9% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1582 MHz versus 1455 MHz
- 3x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 12 GB versus 4 GB
- 2.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 255.521 versus 87.83
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10550 versus 9009
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10550 versus 9009
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse augmenté | 1582 MHz versus 1455 MHz |
Taille de mémore maximale | 12 GB versus 4 GB |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 255.521 versus 87.83 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10550 versus 9009 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10550 versus 9009 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro T1000
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Xp
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA Quadro T1000 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Xp |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6599 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 420 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 32981 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 87.83 | 255.521 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9009 | 10550 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 3698 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3343 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9009 | 10550 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 3698 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3343 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2621.94 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 21.26 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 34.491 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1376.357 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Xp | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Turing | |
Nom de code | TU117 | |
Date de sortie | 27 May 2019 | |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 391 | 318 |
Genre | Mobile Workstation | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1455 MHz | 1582 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1395 MHz | |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 69.84 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 4.470 TFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 2.235 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 768 | |
Pixel fill rate | 46.56 GPixel/s | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 69.84 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 250 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 4700 million | |
Noyaux CUDA | 3840 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | DisplayPort, HDMI |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
HDCP | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 6-pin + 8-pin |
Hauteur | 4.4 in | |
Longeur | 10.5 in | |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 4 GB | 12 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 128 GB/s | 547.7 GB/s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 bit | 384 bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 8000 MHz | |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
GameStream | ||
GPU Boost | ||
SLI | ||
VR Ready |