NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile
- Environ 17% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1425 MHz versus 1216 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 91.20 GTexel/s versus 144 billion / sec
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 12 nm versus 28 nm
- 9.2x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 18 Watt versus 165 Watt
- 178.6x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective) versus 7.0 GB/s
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 39363 versus 34824
- Environ 43% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 157.821 versus 110.006
- Environ 43% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1934.012 versus 1348.307
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 10.833 versus 9.194
- 3.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 136.552 versus 37.443
- Environ 43% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 684.333 versus 477.015
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9851 versus 9566
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9851 versus 9566
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse augmenté | 1425 MHz versus 1216 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 91.20 GTexel/s versus 144 billion / sec |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm versus 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 18 Watt versus 165 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective) versus 7.0 GB/s |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 39363 versus 34824 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 157.821 versus 110.006 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1934.012 versus 1348.307 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 10.833 versus 9.194 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 136.552 versus 37.443 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 684.333 versus 477.015 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9851 versus 9566 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9851 versus 9566 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980
- 2x plus de pipelines: 2048 versus 1024
- Environ 42% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 11100 versus 7810
- Environ 69% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 792 versus 468
- Environ 49% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3690 versus 2476
- Environ 49% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3335 versus 2238
- Environ 49% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3690 versus 2476
- Environ 49% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3335 versus 2238
Caractéristiques | |
Pipelines | 2048 versus 1024 |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 11100 versus 7810 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 792 versus 468 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3690 versus 2476 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3335 versus 2238 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3690 versus 2476 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3335 versus 2238 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7810 | 11100 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 468 | 792 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 39363 | 34824 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 157.821 | 110.006 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1934.012 | 1348.307 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 10.833 | 9.194 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 136.552 | 37.443 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 684.333 | 477.015 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9851 | 9566 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2476 | 3690 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2238 | 3335 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9851 | 9566 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2476 | 3690 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2238 | 3335 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4321 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Turing | Maxwell 2.0 |
Nom de code | TU117 | GM204 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 369 | 366 |
Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
Date de sortie | 19 September 2014 | |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $549 | |
Prix maintenant | $605.06 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 21.18 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1425 MHz | 1216 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 855 MHz | |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 91.20 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 5.837 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 2.918 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 1024 | 2048 |
Pixel fill rate | 45.60 GPixel/s | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 91.20 GTexel/s | 144 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 18 Watt | 165 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 4700 million | 5,200 million |
Noyaux CUDA | 2048 | |
Performance á point flottant | 4,981 gflops | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2 |
Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
Soutien de DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) | 1 | |
Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Soutien de l’écran analog VGA | 1 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Longeur | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 500 Watt | |
Options SLI | 1 | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 2x 6-pins | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 1.2 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.6 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 160 GB/s | 224 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective) | 7.0 GB/s |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive Vertical Sync | ||
BatteryBoost | ||
CUDA | ||
GameStream | ||
GameWorks | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
GPU Boost | ||
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
Optimus | ||
SLI | ||
Surround |