NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 91.20 GTexel/s versus 123.0 GTexel / s
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 12 nm versus 16 nm
- 6.7x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 18 Watt versus 120 Watt
- Environ 33% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 4 GB versus 3 GB
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 39487 versus 32308
- Environ 37% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 157.821 versus 115.073
- Environ 46% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1934.012 versus 1325.07
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 10.833 versus 8.057
- 4.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 136.552 versus 31.946
- Environ 61% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 684.333 versus 425.709
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 91.20 GTexel/s versus 123.0 GTexel / s |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm versus 16 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 18 Watt versus 120 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 3 GB |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 39487 versus 32308 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 157.821 versus 115.073 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1934.012 versus 1325.07 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 10.833 versus 8.057 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 136.552 versus 31.946 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 684.333 versus 425.709 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB
- Environ 76% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1506 MHz versus 855 MHz
- Environ 20% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1708 MHz versus 1425 MHz
- Environ 13% de pipelines plus haut: 1152 versus 1024
- 6.4x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 8008 MHz versus 1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective)
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 9762 versus 7790
- Environ 65% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 772 versus 469
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10566 versus 9851
- Environ 49% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3697 versus 2476
- Environ 49% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3338 versus 2238
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10566 versus 9851
- Environ 49% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3697 versus 2476
- Environ 49% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3338 versus 2238
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1506 MHz versus 855 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1708 MHz versus 1425 MHz |
| Pipelines | 1152 versus 1024 |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 8008 MHz versus 1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective) |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 9762 versus 7790 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 772 versus 469 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10566 versus 9851 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3697 versus 2476 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3338 versus 2238 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10566 versus 9851 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3697 versus 2476 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3338 versus 2238 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 7790 | 9762 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 469 | 772 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 39487 | 32308 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 157.821 | 115.073 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1934.012 | 1325.07 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 10.833 | 8.057 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 136.552 | 31.946 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 684.333 | 425.709 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9851 | 10566 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2476 | 3697 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2238 | 3338 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9851 | 10566 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2476 | 3697 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2238 | 3338 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3851 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
| Nom de code | TU117 | GP106 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 369 | 372 |
| Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
| Date de sortie | 18 August 2016 | |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $199 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1425 MHz | 1708 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 855 MHz | 1506 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 16 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 91.20 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 5.837 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 2.918 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 1024 | 1152 |
| Pixel fill rate | 45.60 GPixel/s | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 91.20 GTexel/s | 123.0 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 18 Watt | 120 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 4700 million | 4,400 million |
| Performance á point flottant | 3,935 gflops | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 250 mm | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.6 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | 3 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 160 GB/s | 192.2 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 192 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective) | 8008 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile avec des autres
NVIDIAQuadro T1200 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1060 3 GB
NVIDIAQuadro T1200 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 16
NVIDIAQuadro T1200 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650
NVIDIAQuadro T1200 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon Pro 5300M
NVIDIAQuadro T1200 Mobile vs
NVIDIAQuadro T1000 Max-Q
NVIDIAQuadro T1200 Mobile vs
IntelArc A570M
