NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 91.20 GTexel/s versus 123.0 GTexel / s
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 12 nm versus 16 nm
- 6.7x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 18 Watt versus 120 Watt
- Environ 33% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 4 GB versus 3 GB
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 38998 versus 32423
- Environ 37% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 157.821 versus 115.073
- Environ 46% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1934.012 versus 1325.07
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 10.833 versus 8.057
- 4.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 136.552 versus 31.946
- Environ 61% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 684.333 versus 425.709
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 91.20 GTexel/s versus 123.0 GTexel / s |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm versus 16 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 18 Watt versus 120 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 3 GB |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 38998 versus 32423 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 157.821 versus 115.073 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1934.012 versus 1325.07 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 10.833 versus 8.057 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 136.552 versus 31.946 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 684.333 versus 425.709 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB
- Environ 76% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1506 MHz versus 855 MHz
- Environ 20% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1708 MHz versus 1425 MHz
- Environ 13% de pipelines plus haut: 1152 versus 1024
- 6.4x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 8008 MHz versus 1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective)
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 9760 versus 7858
- Environ 66% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 773 versus 466
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10566 versus 9851
- Environ 49% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3697 versus 2476
- Environ 49% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3338 versus 2238
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10566 versus 9851
- Environ 49% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3697 versus 2476
- Environ 49% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3338 versus 2238
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1506 MHz versus 855 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1708 MHz versus 1425 MHz |
| Pipelines | 1152 versus 1024 |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 8008 MHz versus 1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective) |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 9760 versus 7858 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 773 versus 466 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10566 versus 9851 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3697 versus 2476 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3338 versus 2238 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10566 versus 9851 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3697 versus 2476 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3338 versus 2238 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 7858 | 9760 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 466 | 773 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 38998 | 32423 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 157.821 | 115.073 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1934.012 | 1325.07 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 10.833 | 8.057 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 136.552 | 31.946 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 684.333 | 425.709 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9851 | 10566 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2476 | 3697 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2238 | 3338 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9851 | 10566 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2476 | 3697 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2238 | 3338 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3849 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
| Nom de code | TU117 | GP106 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 371 | 373 |
| Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
| Date de sortie | 18 August 2016 | |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $199 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1425 MHz | 1708 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 855 MHz | 1506 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 16 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 91.20 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 5.837 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 2.918 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 1024 | 1152 |
| Pixel fill rate | 45.60 GPixel/s | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 91.20 GTexel/s | 123.0 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 18 Watt | 120 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 4700 million | 4,400 million |
| Performance á point flottant | 3,935 gflops | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 250 mm | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.6 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | 3 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 160 GB/s | 192.2 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 192 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective) | 8008 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile avec des autres
NVIDIAQuadro T1200 Mobile vs
NVIDIAQuadro K6000
NVIDIAQuadro T1200 Mobile vs
AMDFirePro S9050
NVIDIAQuadro T1200 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1060 3 GB
NVIDIAQuadro T1200 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650
NVIDIAQuadro T1200 Mobile vs
NVIDIAQuadro T1000 Max-Q
NVIDIAQuadro T1200 Mobile vs
IntelArc A570M
