NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile versus NVIDIA Quadro K6000
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile and NVIDIA Quadro K6000 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile
- Environ 7% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 855 MHz versus 797 MHz
- Environ 58% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1425 MHz versus 902 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 91.20 GTexel/s versus 216.5 GTexel / s
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 12 nm versus 28 nm
- 12.5x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 18 Watt versus 225 Watt
- Environ 62% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 39004 versus 24055
- 2.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 157.821 versus 67.178
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1934.012 versus 1816.61
- Environ 46% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 10.833 versus 7.435
- Environ 54% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 136.552 versus 88.889
- Environ 93% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 684.333 versus 355.166
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 855 MHz versus 797 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1425 MHz versus 902 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 91.20 GTexel/s versus 216.5 GTexel / s |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 18 Watt versus 225 Watt |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 39004 versus 24055 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 157.821 versus 67.178 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1934.012 versus 1816.61 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 10.833 versus 7.435 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 136.552 versus 88.889 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 684.333 versus 355.166 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro K6000
- 2.8x plus de pipelines: 2880 versus 1024
- 3x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 12 GB versus 4 GB
- 4.8x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 6008 MHz versus 1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective)
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 8065 versus 7858
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 547 versus 466
- Environ 28% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12657 versus 9851
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3711 versus 2476
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 versus 2238
- Environ 28% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12657 versus 9851
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3711 versus 2476
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 versus 2238
| Caractéristiques | |
| Pipelines | 2880 versus 1024 |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 12 GB versus 4 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 6008 MHz versus 1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective) |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 8065 versus 7858 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 547 versus 466 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12657 versus 9851 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3711 versus 2476 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 versus 2238 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12657 versus 9851 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3711 versus 2476 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 versus 2238 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K6000
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile | NVIDIA Quadro K6000 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 7858 | 8065 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 466 | 547 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 39004 | 24055 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 157.821 | 67.178 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1934.012 | 1816.61 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 10.833 | 7.435 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 136.552 | 88.889 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 684.333 | 355.166 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9851 | 12657 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2476 | 3711 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2238 | 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9851 | 12657 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2476 | 3711 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2238 | 3356 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile | NVIDIA Quadro K6000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Kepler |
| Nom de code | TU117 | GK110B |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 371 | 369 |
| Genre | Laptop | Workstation |
| Date de sortie | 23 July 2013 | |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $5,265 | |
| Prix maintenant | $833.98 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 11.34 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1425 MHz | 902 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 855 MHz | 797 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 91.20 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 5.837 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 2.918 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 1024 | 2880 |
| Pixel fill rate | 45.60 GPixel/s | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 91.20 GTexel/s | 216.5 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 18 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 4700 million | 7,080 million |
| Performance á point flottant | 5,196 gflops | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 2x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 267 mm | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 2x 6-pin | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.6 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | 12 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 160 GB/s | 288.4 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective) | 6008 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile avec des autres
NVIDIAQuadro T1200 Mobile vs
NVIDIAQuadro K6000
NVIDIAQuadro T1200 Mobile vs
AMDFirePro S9050
NVIDIAQuadro T1200 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1060 3 GB
NVIDIAQuadro T1200 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650
NVIDIAQuadro T1200 Mobile vs
NVIDIAQuadro T1000 Max-Q
NVIDIAQuadro T1200 Mobile vs
IntelArc A570M
