NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q versus AMD Radeon R7 370
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q and AMD Radeon R7 370 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 11 mois plus tard
- Environ 66% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1620 MHz versus 975 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 103.7 GTexel/s versus 62.4 GTexel / s
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 12 nm versus 28 nm
- 2.8x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 40 Watt versus 110 Watt
- 2.1x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 2000 MHz (8000 MHz effective) versus 975 MHz
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 7682 versus 7102
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 7682 versus 7102
- Environ 53% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 6927 versus 4521
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 27 May 2019 versus 18 June 2015 |
Vitesse augmenté | 1620 MHz versus 975 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 103.7 GTexel/s versus 62.4 GTexel / s |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm versus 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt versus 110 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 2000 MHz (8000 MHz effective) versus 975 MHz |
Référence | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7682 versus 7102 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7682 versus 7102 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6927 versus 4521 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R7 370
- 2.1x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 86561 versus 41315
- Environ 41% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 605 versus 429
Référence | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3707 versus 3703 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3707 versus 3703 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 versus 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 versus 3356 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 86561 versus 41315 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 605 versus 429 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 370
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q | AMD Radeon R7 370 |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7682 | 7102 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7682 | 7102 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3703 | 3707 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3703 | 3707 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3359 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 41315 | 86561 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 429 | 605 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6927 | 4521 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 72.514 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1506.404 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.267 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 116.279 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 359.237 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1499 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q | AMD Radeon R7 370 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Turing | GCN 1.0 |
Nom de code | TU117 | Trinidad |
Date de sortie | 27 May 2019 | 18 June 2015 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 381 | 405 |
Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
Conception | AMD Radeon R7 300 Series | |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $149 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1620 MHz | 975 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1200 MHz | |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 103.7 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 6.636 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.318 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 1024 | 1024 |
Pixel fill rate | 51.84 GPixel/s | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 103.7 GTexel/s | 62.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt | 110 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 4700 million | 2,800 million |
Performance á point flottant | 1,997 gflops | |
Stream Processors | 1024 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
Nombre d’écrans Eyefinity | 6 | |
VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 1 x 6-pin |
Largeur | IGP | |
Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | |
Longeur | 152 mm | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mantle | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 128.0 GB/s | 179.2 GB/s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 bit | 256 bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 2000 MHz (8000 MHz effective) | 975 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
CrossFire | ||
DDMA audio | ||
FreeSync | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) |