NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q vs AMD Radeon R7 370

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q and AMD Radeon R7 370 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 11 month(s) later
  • Around 66% higher boost clock speed: 1620 MHz vs 975 MHz
  • 1661.9x more texture fill rate: 103.7 GTexel/s vs 62.4 GTexel / s
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
  • 2.8x lower typical power consumption: 40 Watt vs 110 Watt
  • 2.1x more memory clock speed: 2000 MHz (8000 MHz effective) vs 975 MHz
  • Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9720 vs 7102
  • Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9720 vs 7102
  • Around 60% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7127 vs 4460
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 27 May 2019 vs 18 June 2015
Boost clock speed 1620 MHz vs 975 MHz
Texture fill rate 103.7 GTexel/s vs 62.4 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 40 Watt vs 110 Watt
Memory clock speed 2000 MHz (8000 MHz effective) vs 975 MHz
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 9720 vs 7102
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 9720 vs 7102
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3713 vs 3707
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3713 vs 3707
PassMark - G3D Mark 7127 vs 4460

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 370

  • 2.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 86561 vs 40688
  • Around 32% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 575 vs 436
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3359 vs 3358
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3359 vs 3358
Geekbench - OpenCL 86561 vs 40688
PassMark - G2D Mark 575 vs 436

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 370

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
9720
7102
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
9720
7102
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3713
3707
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3713
3707
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3358
3359
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3358
3359
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
40688
86561
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
436
575
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
7127
4460
Name NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q AMD Radeon R7 370
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 9720 7102
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 9720 7102
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3713 3707
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3713 3707
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3358 3359
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3358 3359
Geekbench - OpenCL 40688 86561
PassMark - G2D Mark 436 575
PassMark - G3D Mark 7127 4460
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 72.514
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1506.404
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 7.267
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 116.279
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 359.237
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 1498

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q AMD Radeon R7 370

Essentials

Architecture Turing GCN 1.0
Code name TU117 Trinidad
Launch date 27 May 2019 18 June 2015
Place in performance rating 203 243
Type Laptop Desktop
Design AMD Radeon R7 300 Series
Launch price (MSRP) $149

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1620 MHz 975 MHz
Core clock speed 1200 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm 28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 103.7 GFLOPS (1:32)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 6.636 TFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 3.318 TFLOPS
Pipelines 1024 1024
Pixel fill rate 51.84 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 103.7 GTexel/s 62.4 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 40 Watt 110 Watt
Transistor count 4700 million 2,800 million
Floating-point performance 1,997 gflops
Stream Processors 1024

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
DisplayPort support
Dual-link DVI support
Eyefinity
HDMI
Number of Eyefinity displays 6
VGA

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors None 1 x 6-pin
Width IGP
Bus support PCIe 3.0
Length 152 mm

API support

DirectX 12.1 12
OpenCL 1.2 2.0
OpenGL 4.6 4.5
Shader Model 6.5
Vulkan
Mantle

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 4 GB
Memory bandwidth 128.0 GB/s 179.2 GB/s
Memory bus width 128 bit 256 bit
Memory clock speed 2000 MHz (8000 MHz effective) 975 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5
Shared memory 0

Technologies

AMD Eyefinity
AppAcceleration
CrossFire
DDMA audio
FreeSync
TrueAudio
Video Code Engine (VCE)