NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q vs AMD Radeon R7 370

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q and AMD Radeon R7 370 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q

AMD Radeon R7 370

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q

Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 11 month(s) later
Around 66% higher boost clock speed: 1620 MHz vs 975 MHz
1661.9x more texture fill rate: 103.7 GTexel/s vs 62.4 GTexel / s
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
2.8x lower typical power consumption: 40 Watt vs 110 Watt
2.1x more memory clock speed: 2000 MHz (8000 MHz effective) vs 975 MHz
Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 7682 vs 7102
Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 7682 vs 7102
Around 53% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6923 vs 4519

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	27 May 2019 vs 18 June 2015
Boost clock speed	1620 MHz vs 975 MHz
Texture fill rate	103.7 GTexel/s vs 62.4 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	40 Watt vs 110 Watt
Memory clock speed	2000 MHz (8000 MHz effective) vs 975 MHz
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	7682 vs 7102
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	7682 vs 7102
PassMark - G3D Mark	6923 vs 4519

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 370

2.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 86561 vs 41349
Around 41% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 605 vs 430

Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3707 vs 3703
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3707 vs 3703
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3359 vs 3356
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3359 vs 3356
Geekbench - OpenCL	86561 vs 41349
PassMark - G2D Mark	605 vs 430

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 370

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

7682

7102

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

7682

7102

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3703

3707

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3703

3707

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3356

3359

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3356

3359

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

41349

86561

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

430

605

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

6923

4519

Name	NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q	AMD Radeon R7 370
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	7682	7102
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	7682	7102
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3703	3707
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3703	3707
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3356	3359
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3356	3359
Geekbench - OpenCL	41349	86561
PassMark - G2D Mark	430	605
PassMark - G3D Mark	6923	4519
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		72.514
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		1506.404
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		7.267
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		116.279
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		359.237
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		1499

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q	AMD Radeon R7 370
Essentials
Architecture	Turing	GCN 1.0
Code name	TU117	Trinidad
Launch date	27 May 2019	18 June 2015
Place in performance rating	381	406
Type	Laptop	Desktop
Design		AMD Radeon R7 300 Series
Launch price (MSRP)		$149
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1620 MHz	975 MHz
Core clock speed	1200 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	103.7 GFLOPS (1:32)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	6.636 TFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	3.318 TFLOPS
Pipelines	1024	1024
Pixel fill rate	51.84 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	103.7 GTexel/s	62.4 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	40 Watt	110 Watt
Transistor count	4700 million	2,800 million
Floating-point performance		1,997 gflops
Stream Processors		1024
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
DisplayPort support
Dual-link DVI support
Eyefinity
HDMI
Number of Eyefinity displays		6
VGA
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	1 x 6-pin
Width	IGP
Bus support		PCIe 3.0
Length		152 mm
API support
DirectX	12.1	12
OpenCL	1.2	2.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
Shader Model	6.5
Vulkan
Mantle
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	4 GB
Memory bandwidth	128.0 GB/s	179.2 GB/s
Memory bus width	128 bit	256 bit
Memory clock speed	2000 MHz (8000 MHz effective)	975 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Shared memory		0
Technologies
AMD Eyefinity
AppAcceleration
CrossFire
DDMA audio
FreeSync
TrueAudio
Video Code Engine (VCE)