NVIDIA RTX A5000 versus AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA RTX A5000 and AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA RTX A5000
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 5 mois plus tard
- Environ 60% de pipelines plus haut: 8192 versus 5120
- Environ 30% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 230 Watt versus 300 Watt
- Environ 50% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 24 GB versus 16 GB
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 581.432 versus 543.753
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 54.372 versus 51.155
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 22508 versus 17213
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 22508 versus 17213
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 12 Apr 2021 versus 28 Oct 2020 |
| Pipelines | 8192 versus 5120 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 230 Watt versus 300 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 24 GB versus 16 GB |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 581.432 versus 543.753 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 54.372 versus 51.155 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22508 versus 17213 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 versus 3350 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22508 versus 17213 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 versus 3350 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT
- Environ 56% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1825 MHz versus 1170 MHz
- Environ 33% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 2250 MHz versus 1695 MHz
- Environ 66% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 720.0 GTexel/s versus 433.9 GTexel/s
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 7 nm versus 8 nm
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 26736 versus 22652
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 1047 versus 1029
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 165731 versus 154972
- Environ 67% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 320.733 versus 191.518
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2566.9 versus 2038.811
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1825 MHz versus 1170 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 2250 MHz versus 1695 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 720.0 GTexel/s versus 433.9 GTexel/s |
| Processus de fabrication | 7 nm versus 8 nm |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 26736 versus 22652 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1047 versus 1029 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 165731 versus 154972 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 320.733 versus 191.518 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2566.9 versus 2038.811 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX A5000
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA RTX A5000 | AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 22652 | 26736 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1029 | 1047 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 154972 | 165731 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 581.432 | 543.753 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6836.931 | 0 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 54.372 | 51.155 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 191.518 | 320.733 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2038.811 | 2566.9 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22508 | 17213 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3350 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22508 | 17213 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3350 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 21042 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA RTX A5000 | AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 2.0 |
| Nom de code | GA102 | Navi 21 |
| Date de sortie | 12 Apr 2021 | 28 Oct 2020 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 70 | 73 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $999 | |
| Genre | Desktop | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1695 MHz | 2250 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1170 MHz | 1825 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 8 nm | 7 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 867.8 GFLOPS (1:32) | 1440 GFLOPS (1:16) |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 27.77 TFLOPS (1:1) | 46.08 TFLOPS (2:1) |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 27.77 TFLOPS | 23.04 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 8192 | 5120 |
| Pixel fill rate | 162.7 GPixel/s | 288.0 GPixel/s |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 433.9 GTexel/s | 720.0 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 230 Watt | 300 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 28300 million | 26800 million |
| Unités de Compute | 80 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 4x DisplayPort | 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Facteur de forme | Dual-slot | Triple-slot |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | 267 mm (10.5 inches) |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 550 Watt | 700 Watt |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
| Largeur | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | 120 mm (4.7 inches) |
| Hauteur | 50 mm (2 inches) | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.6 | 6.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 24 GB | 16 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 768 GB/s | 512 GB/s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 384 bit | 256 bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA RTX A5000 avec des autres
NVIDIARTX A5000 vs
AMDRadeon RX 6900 XT
NVIDIARTX A5000 vs
AMDRadeon Pro V520
NVIDIARTX A5000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4060
NVIDIARTX A5000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB
NVIDIARTX A5000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3060 8 GB
NVIDIARTX A5000 vs
AMDRadeon RX 7600 XT
