NVIDIA RTX A5000 versus NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA RTX A5000 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA RTX A5000
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 5 mois plus tard
- Environ 5% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1695 MHz versus 1620 MHz
- 3.6x plus de pipelines: 8192 versus 2304
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 8 nm versus 12 nm
- Environ 42% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 22894 versus 16171
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 1038 versus 824
- Environ 75% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 154660 versus 88586
- 2.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 581.432 versus 252.062
- Environ 83% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 6836.931 versus 3729.447
- 2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 54.372 versus 27.133
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 191.518 versus 154.621
- Environ 56% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2038.811 versus 1303.435
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 12 Apr 2021 versus 17 October 2018 |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1695 MHz versus 1620 MHz |
| Pipelines | 8192 versus 2304 |
| Processus de fabrication | 8 nm versus 12 nm |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 22894 versus 16171 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1038 versus 824 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 154660 versus 88586 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 581.432 versus 252.062 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6836.931 versus 3729.447 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 54.372 versus 27.133 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 191.518 versus 154.621 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2038.811 versus 1303.435 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 versus 3350 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 versus 3350 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070
- Environ 21% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1410 MHz versus 1170 MHz
- Environ 31% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 175 Watt versus 230 Watt
- 7x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 14000 MHz versus 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective)
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1410 MHz versus 1170 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 175 Watt versus 230 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz versus 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22615 versus 22508 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 versus 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22615 versus 22508 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 versus 3714 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX A5000
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA RTX A5000 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 22894 | 16171 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1038 | 824 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 154660 | 88586 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 581.432 | 252.062 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6836.931 | 3729.447 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 54.372 | 27.133 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 191.518 | 154.621 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2038.811 | 1303.435 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22508 | 22615 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3350 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22508 | 22615 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3350 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 8877 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA RTX A5000 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
| Nom de code | GA102 | TU106 |
| Date de sortie | 12 Apr 2021 | 17 October 2018 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 65 | 140 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $499 | |
| Prix maintenant | $499.99 | |
| Genre | Desktop | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 42.76 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1695 MHz | 1620 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1170 MHz | 1410 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 8 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 867.8 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 27.77 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 27.77 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 8192 | 2304 |
| Pixel fill rate | 162.7 GPixel/s | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 433.9 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 230 Watt | 175 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 28300 million | 10,800 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 4x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Facteur de forme | Dual-slot | |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | 229 mm |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 550 Watt | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 8-pin | 1x 8-pin |
| Largeur | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.6 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 24 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 768 GB/s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 384 bit | 256 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) | 14000 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA RTX A5000 avec des autres
NVIDIARTX A5000 vs
AMDRadeon RX 6800 XT
NVIDIARTX A5000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2060 12GB
NVIDIARTX A5000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile
NVIDIARTX A5000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4060
NVIDIARTX A5000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB
NVIDIARTX A5000 vs
AMDRadeon RX 6700
