NVIDIA RTX A6000 versus AMD Radeon RX 6800
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA RTX A6000 and AMD Radeon RX 6800 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA RTX A6000
- Environ 24% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 625.0 GTexel/s versus 505.2 GTexel/s
- 2.8x plus de pipelines: 10752 versus 3840
- 3x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 48 GB versus 16 GB
- Environ 59% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 200330 versus 126207
- Environ 71% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 737.53 versus 432.118
- Environ 43% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 59.432 versus 41.585
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2347.314 versus 2280.457
- Environ 43% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 23142 versus 16162
- Environ 43% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 23142 versus 16162
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 17833 versus 16302
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 625.0 GTexel/s versus 505.2 GTexel/s |
| Pipelines | 10752 versus 3840 |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 48 GB versus 16 GB |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 200330 versus 126207 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 737.53 versus 432.118 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 59.432 versus 41.585 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2347.314 versus 2280.457 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 23142 versus 16162 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 23142 versus 16162 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 17833 versus 16302 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 6800
- Environ 17% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1700 MHz versus 1455 MHz
- Environ 13% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 2105 MHz versus 1860 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 7 nm versus 8 nm
- Environ 20% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 250 Watt versus 300 Watt
- 5.3x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 22310 versus 4237
- 11.3x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 972 versus 86
- 2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 383.037 versus 189.702
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3373 versus 3353
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3373 versus 3353
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1700 MHz versus 1455 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 2105 MHz versus 1860 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 7 nm versus 8 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt versus 300 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 22310 versus 4237 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 972 versus 86 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 383.037 versus 189.702 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 versus 3712 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3373 versus 3353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 versus 3712 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3373 versus 3353 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX A6000
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 6800
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA RTX A6000 | AMD Radeon RX 6800 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4237 | 22310 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 86 | 972 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 200330 | 126207 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 737.53 | 432.118 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 59.432 | 41.585 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 189.702 | 383.037 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2347.314 | 2280.457 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 23142 | 16162 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3712 | 3719 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 3373 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 23142 | 16162 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3712 | 3719 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 3373 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 17833 | 16302 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA RTX A6000 | AMD Radeon RX 6800 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 2.0 |
| Nom de code | GA102 | Navi 21 |
| Date de sortie | 5 Oct 2020 | 28 Oct 2020 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $4649 | $579 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 93 | 75 |
| Genre | Desktop | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1860 MHz | 2105 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1455 MHz | 1700 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 8 nm | 7 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 1250 GFLOPS (1:32) | 1010 GFLOPS (1:16) |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 40.00 TFLOPS (1:1) | 32.33 TFLOPS (2:1) |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 40.00 TFLOPS | 16.17 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 10752 | 3840 |
| Pixel fill rate | 208.3 GPixel/s | 202.1 GPixel/s |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 625.0 GTexel/s | 505.2 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 300 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 28300 million | 26800 million |
| Unités de Compute | 60 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 4x DisplayPort | 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Facteur de forme | Dual-slot | |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | 267 mm (10.5 inches) |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 700 Watt | 600 Watt |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 8-pin EPS | 2x 8-pin |
| Largeur | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | 120 mm (4.7 inches) |
| Hauteur | 40 mm (1.6 inches) | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.6 | 6.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 48 GB | 16 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 768 GB/s | 512.0 GB/s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 384 bit | 256 bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA RTX A6000 avec des autres
NVIDIARTX A6000 vs
NVIDIAQuadro GV100
NVIDIARTX A6000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3080 Mobile
NVIDIARTX A6000 vs
NVIDIARTX A2000
NVIDIARTX A6000 vs
AMDRadeon RX 6650M
NVIDIARTX A6000 vs
AMDRadeon RX 6850M XT
NVIDIARTX A6000 vs
AMDRadeon RX 6300
