NVIDIA TITAN Xp versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA TITAN Xp and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA TITAN Xp
- Environ 7% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 379.7 GTexel / s versus 354.4 GTexel / s
- Environ 7% de pipelines plus haut: 3840 versus 3584
- Environ 7% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 12,150 gflops versus 11,340 gflops
- Environ 9% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 12 GB versus 11 GB
- Environ 4% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 11408 MHz versus 11008 MHz
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 72551 versus 67670
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 256.103 versus 205.837
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2513.321 versus 2406.499
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 19.708 versus 19.591
- Environ 67% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 43.083 versus 25.833
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1139.382 versus 1002.573
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2372 versus 2231
Caractéristiques | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 379.7 GTexel / s versus 354.4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 3840 versus 3584 |
Performance á point flottant | 12,150 gflops versus 11,340 gflops |
Taille de mémore maximale | 12 GB versus 11 GB |
Vitesse de mémoire | 11408 MHz versus 11008 MHz |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 72551 versus 67670 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 256.103 versus 205.837 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2513.321 versus 2406.499 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 19.708 versus 19.591 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 43.083 versus 25.833 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1139.382 versus 1002.573 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2372 versus 2231 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)
- Environ 5% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1481 MHz versus 1405 MHz
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 18598 versus 17881
- Environ 37% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 15019 versus 10966
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3716 versus 3686
- Environ 37% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 15019 versus 10966
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3716 versus 3686
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1481 MHz versus 1405 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 18598 versus 17881 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 937 versus 934 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15019 versus 10966 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 versus 3686 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 versus 3343 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15019 versus 10966 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 versus 3686 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 versus 3343 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA TITAN Xp
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA TITAN Xp | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 17881 | 18598 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 934 | 937 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 72551 | 67670 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 256.103 | 205.837 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2513.321 | 2406.499 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 19.708 | 19.591 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 43.083 | 25.833 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1139.382 | 1002.573 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10966 | 15019 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3686 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3343 | 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10966 | 15019 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3686 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3343 | 3357 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2372 | 2231 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA TITAN Xp | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Pascal |
Nom de code | GP102 | GP102 |
Date de sortie | 6 April 2017 | 10 March 2017 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $1,199 | $699 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 225 | 219 |
Prix maintenant | $1,200 | $826.98 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 15.97 | 27.48 |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1582 MHz | 1582 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1405 MHz | 1481 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 12,150 gflops | 11,340 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 16 nm | 16 nm |
Pipelines | 3840 | 3584 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 379.7 GTexel / s | 354.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 250 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 11,800 million | 11,800 million |
Température maximale du GPU | 91 °C | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 267 mm | 10.5" (26.7 cm) |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 12 GB | 11 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 547.6 GB / s | 484.4 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 384 Bit | 352 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 11408 MHz | 11008 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5X | GDDR5X |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Ansel | ||
CUDA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
HDMI 2.0b | ||
PCIe 3.0 | ||
SLI | ||
Virtual Reality |