NVIDIA Tesla T4 versus NVIDIA Quadro P4000
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Tesla T4 and NVIDIA Quadro P4000 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Tesla T4
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 7 mois plus tard
- Environ 2% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1515 MHz versus 1480 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 12 nm versus 16 nm
- Environ 33% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 75 Watt versus 100 Watt
- Environ 32% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 10000 MHz versus 7604 MHz
- Environ 45% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 61276 versus 42289
- Environ 90% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3026.812 versus 1590.392
- Environ 65% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 18.798 versus 11.365
- 2.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 119.936 versus 45.977
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 910.721 versus 751.626
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 13 September 2018 versus 6 February 2017 |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1515 MHz versus 1480 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm versus 16 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt versus 100 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 10000 MHz versus 7604 MHz |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 61276 versus 42289 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3026.812 versus 1590.392 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 18.798 versus 11.365 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 119.936 versus 45.977 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 910.721 versus 751.626 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro P4000
- Environ 20% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1202 MHz versus 1005 MHz
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 11631 versus 10744
- Environ 38% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 816 versus 590
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 152.325 versus 127.622
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 15267 versus 14076
- Environ 88% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3714 versus 1976
- Environ 89% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 versus 1781
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 15267 versus 14076
- Environ 88% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3714 versus 1976
- Environ 89% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 versus 1781
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1202 MHz versus 1005 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 11631 versus 10744 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 816 versus 590 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 152.325 versus 127.622 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15267 versus 14076 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 versus 1976 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 versus 1781 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15267 versus 14076 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 versus 1976 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 versus 1781 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla T4
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P4000
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA Tesla T4 | NVIDIA Quadro P4000 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 10744 | 11631 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 590 | 816 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 61276 | 42289 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 127.622 | 152.325 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3026.812 | 1590.392 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 18.798 | 11.365 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 119.936 | 45.977 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 910.721 | 751.626 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14076 | 15267 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1976 | 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1781 | 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14076 | 15267 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1976 | 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1781 | 3358 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4904 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA Tesla T4 | NVIDIA Quadro P4000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
| Nom de code | TU104 | GP104 |
| Date de sortie | 13 September 2018 | 6 February 2017 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 282 | 285 |
| Genre | Workstation | Workstation |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $815 | |
| Prix maintenant | $799.99 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 17.17 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1515 MHz | 1480 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1005 MHz | 1202 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 16 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 13,600 million | 7,200 million |
| Performance á point flottant | 5,304 gflops | |
| Pipelines | 1792 | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 165.8 GTexel / s | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 4x DisplayPort |
| Display Port | 1.4 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 1x 6-pin |
| Longeur | 241 mm | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| Vitesse de mémoire | 10000 MHz | 7604 MHz |
| RAM maximale | 8 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 192 GB / s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Stereo | ||
| Mosaic | ||
| nView Display Management | ||
| Optimus | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA Tesla T4 avec des autres
NVIDIATesla T4 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop)
NVIDIATesla T4 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1060 Mobile 6 GB
NVIDIATesla T4 vs
NVIDIAQuadro P4000
NVIDIATesla T4 vs
AMDRadeon Pro 5600M
NVIDIATesla T4 vs
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile
NVIDIATesla T4 vs
AMDRadeon RX 6500M
