Intel HD Graphics 630 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel HD Graphics 630 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel HD Graphics 630
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 6 mois plus tard
- Environ 11% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 27.6 GTexel / s versus 24.79 GTexel / s
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- 3.7x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 55 Watt
- 16x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 64 GB versus 4 GB
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 27.948 versus 24.117
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.795 versus 1.651
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1945 versus 1813
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3344 versus 3309
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1945 versus 1813
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3344 versus 3309
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 30 August 2016 versus 18 February 2014 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 27.6 GTexel / s versus 24.79 GTexel / s |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 55 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 64 GB versus 4 GB |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.948 versus 24.117 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.795 versus 1.651 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1945 versus 1813 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3344 versus 3309 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1945 versus 1813 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3344 versus 3309 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM
- 3x plus de vitesse du noyau: 1033 MHz versus 350 MHz
- 16x plus de pipelines: 384 versus 24
- Environ 80% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 793.3 gflops versus 441.6 gflops
- Environ 92% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 2135 versus 1114
- Environ 77% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 475 versus 268
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 6108 versus 4554
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 335.835 versus 312.246
- Environ 33% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 27.096 versus 20.404
- 3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 97.126 versus 32.567
- Environ 57% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2918 versus 1859
- Environ 57% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2918 versus 1859
- Environ 69% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 655 versus 388
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1033 MHz versus 350 MHz |
| Pipelines | 384 versus 24 |
| Performance á point flottant | 793.3 gflops versus 441.6 gflops |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2135 versus 1114 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 475 versus 268 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 6108 versus 4554 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 335.835 versus 312.246 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 27.096 versus 20.404 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 97.126 versus 32.567 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2918 versus 1859 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2918 versus 1859 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 655 versus 388 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 630
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | Intel HD Graphics 630 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1114 | 2135 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 268 | 475 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4554 | 6108 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.948 | 24.117 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 312.246 | 335.835 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.795 | 1.651 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 20.404 | 27.096 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 32.567 | 97.126 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1859 | 2918 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1945 | 1813 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3344 | 3309 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1859 | 2918 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1945 | 1813 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3344 | 3309 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 388 | 655 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel HD Graphics 630 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Maxwell |
| Nom de code | Kaby Lake GT2 | GM107 |
| Date de sortie | 30 August 2016 | 18 February 2014 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1216 | 979 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1150 MHz | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 350 MHz | 1033 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 441.6 gflops | 793.3 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 24 | 384 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 27.6 GTexel / s | 24.79 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 55 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 189 million | 1,870 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 145 mm | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 64 GB | 4 GB |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 / 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / LPDDR4 | DDR3 |
| Mémoire partagé | 1 | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 28.8 GB / s | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz | |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer Intel HD Graphics 630 avec des autres
IntelHD Graphics 630 vs
ATIRadeon IGP 350M
IntelHD Graphics 630 vs
NVIDIAGeForce FX 5200 Ultra
IntelHD Graphics 630 vs
ATIRadeon 9600 TX
IntelHD Graphics 630 vs
AMDRadeon R7 M260X
IntelHD Graphics 630 vs
AMDRadeon R7 M460
IntelHD Graphics 630 vs
NVIDIAGRID M3-3020
