Intel HD Graphics 630 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM

Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 630 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 630

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 6 month(s) later
• Around 11% higher texture fill rate: 27.6 GTexel / s vs 24.79 GTexel / s
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 3.7x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 55 Watt
• 16x more maximum memory size: 64 GB vs 4 GB
• Around 16% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 27.948 vs 24.117
• Around 9% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.795 vs 1.651
• Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1945 vs 1813
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3344 vs 3309
• Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1945 vs 1813
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3344 vs 3309

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM

• 3x more core clock speed: 1033 MHz vs 350 MHz
• 16x more pipelines: 384 vs 24
• Around 80% better floating-point performance: 793.3 gflops vs 441.6 gflops
• Around 92% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2135 vs 1114
• Around 77% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 475 vs 268
• Around 34% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 6108 vs 4554
• Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 335.835 vs 312.246
• Around 33% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 27.096 vs 20.404
• 3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 97.126 vs 32.567
• Around 57% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2918 vs 1859
• Around 57% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2918 vs 1859
• Around 69% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 655 vs 388

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 630
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1114 2135
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	268 475
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	4554 6108
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	27.948 24.117
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	312.246 335.835
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.795 1.651
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	20.404 27.096
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	32.567 97.126
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1859 2918
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1945 1813
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3344 3309
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1859 2918
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1945 1813
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3344 3309
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	388 655

Compare specifications (specs)