AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 Grafikkartenbewertung
Radeon Pro WX 3200 Grafikkarte veröffentlicht von AMD; Erscheinungsdatum: 27 May 2019. Zum Zeitpunkt der Freigabe kostete die Grafikkarte $199. Die Videokarte ist für workstation-Computer ausgelegt und basiert auf der Mikroarchitektur Polaris codename Lexa.
Kerntaktfrequenz - 925 MHz. Boost-Taktfrequenz - 1082 MHz. Texturfüllrate - 34.62 GTexel/s. Fertigungsprozesstechnik- 14 nm. Transistorzahl - 2200 million. Stromverbrauch (TDP) - 65 Watt.
Speichertyp: GDDR5. Maximaler RAM Wert- 4 GB. Speicherbusbreite - 128 bit. Speichertaktfrequenz - 4000 MHz. Speicherbandbreite- 96 GB/s.
Benchmarks
| PassMark G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop Face Detection |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop Ocean Surface Simulation |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop T-Rex |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop Video Composition |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop Bitcoin Mining |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 Car Chase Offscreen |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 Manhattan |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 T-Rex |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 Car Chase Offscreen |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 Manhattan |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 T-Rex |
|
|
| Name | Wert |
|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2398 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 411 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 14219 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection | 25.896 mPixels/s |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation | 486.804 Frames/s |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex | 2.503 Frames/s |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition | 53.111 Frames/s |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining | 100.658 mHash/s |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen | 2524 Frames |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan | 3274 Frames |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex | 3352 Frames |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen | 2524.000 Fps |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan | 3274.000 Fps |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex | 3352.000 Fps |
Leistung der Spiele
Control (2019)
| Low, 1280x720 | 42.40 |
| Medium, 1920x1080 | 12.50 |
| High, 1920x1080 | 8.30 |
Total War: Three Kingdoms (2019)
| Low, 1280x720 | 55.50 |
| Medium, 1920x1080 | 15.30 |
| High, 1920x1080 | 9.90 |
| Ultra, 1920x1080 | 4.00 |
F1 2019 (2019)
| Low, 1280x720 | 59.00 |
| Medium, 1920x1080 | 33.00 |
| High, 1920x1080 | 25.00 |
| Ultra, 1920x1080 | 15.00 |
Rage 2 (2019)
| Low, 1280x720 | 40.90 |
| Medium, 1920x1080 | 16.80 |
| High, 1920x1080 | 14.10 |
| Ultra, 1920x1080 | 10.00 |
Metro Exodus (2019)
| Low, 1280x720 | 31.10 |
| Medium, 1920x1080 | 14.00 |
| High, 1920x1080 | 10.00 |
| Ultra, 1920x1080 | 7.00 |
Apex Legends (2019)
| Low, 1280x720 | 65.90 |
| Medium, 1920x1080 | 24.30 |
| High, 1920x1080 | 15.10 |
| Ultra, 1920x1080 | 13.20 |
Far Cry 5 (2018)
| Low, 1280x720 | 43.00 |
| Medium, 1920x1080 | 20.00 |
| High, 1920x1080 | 18.00 |
| Ultra, 1920x1080 | 17.00 |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)
| Low, 1280x720 | 25.20 |
| Medium, 1920x1080 | 16.65 |
| High, 1920x1080 | 15.15 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)
| Low, 1280x720 | 26.30 |
| Medium, 1920x1080 | 9.70 |
| High, 1920x1080 | 6.30 |
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016)
| Low, 1024x768 | 50.60 |
| Medium, 1366x768 | 36.22 |
| High, 1920x1080 | 18.54 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)
| Low, 1280x720 | 100.50 |
| Medium, 1366x768 | 86.50 |
| High, 1920x1080 | 48.55 |
| Ultra, 1920x1080 | 34.85 |
| 4K, 3840x2160 | 9.40 |
The Witcher 3 (2015)
| Low, 1024x768 | 58.10 |
| Medium, 1366x768 | 31.05 |
| High, 1920x1080 | 15.15 |
| Ultra, 1920x1080 | 10.30 |
| 4K, 3840x2160 | 5.20 |
Thief (2014)
| Medium, 1366x768 | 36.40 |
| High, 1366x768 | 34.90 |
| Ultra, 1920x1080 | 19.90 |
BioShock Infinite (2013)
| Low, 1280x720 | 186.60 |
| Medium, 1366x768 | 90.40 |
| High, 1366x768 | 82.35 |
| Ultra, 1920x1080 | 29.58 |
Tomb Raider (2013)
| Low, 1024x768 | 184.60 |
| Medium, 1366x768 | 98.50 |
| High, 1366x768 | 71.80 |
| Ultra, 1920x1080 | 35.00 |
Spezifikationen
Essenzielles |
|
| Architektur | Polaris |
| Codename | Lexa |
| Startdatum | 27 May 2019 |
| Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $199 |
| Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 841 |
| Typ | Workstation |
Technische Info |
|
| Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1082 MHz |
| Berechnungseinheiten | 10 |
| Kerntaktfrequenz | 925 MHz |
| Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 14 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 86.56 GFLOPS |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1,385 GFLOPS |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1,385 GFLOPS |
| Pixel-Füllrate | 17.31 GPixel/s |
| Stream Processors | 640 |
| Texturfüllrate | 34.62 GTexel/s |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 65 Watt |
| Anzahl der Transistoren | 2200 million |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
|
| Display-Anschlüsse | 4x mini-DisplayPort |
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
|
| Höhe | Half Height |
| Schnittstelle | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Länge | 6.6" (168 mm) |
| Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | None |
API-Unterstützung |
|
| DirectX | 12.0 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 |
| Vulkan | |
Speicher |
|
| Maximale RAM-Belastung | 4 GB |
| Speicherbandbreite | 96 GB/s |
| Breite des Speicherbusses | 128 bit |
| Speichertaktfrequenz | 4000 MHz |
| Speichertyp | GDDR5 |
Technologien |
|
| AMD Eyefinity | |
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | |
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | |
Navigation
Einen Grafikprozessor auswählen
Grafikkarten vergleichen
Vergleiche AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 mit anderen
AMDRadeon Pro WX 3200 vs
ATIRadeon HD 4250
AMDRadeon Pro WX 3200 vs
NVIDIAQuadro K4000M
AMDRadeon Pro WX 3200 vs
AMDFirePro M6100
AMDRadeon Pro WX 3200 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 825M
AMDRadeon Pro WX 3200 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 830A
AMDRadeon Pro WX 3200 vs
AMDRadeon 610M (Dragon Range)
