Reseña de la tarjeta de video AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
La tarjeta de video Radeon Pro WX 3200 fue lanzada al mercado por AMD; fecha de lanzamiento: 27 May 2019. Para el momento del lanzamiento, la tarjeta de video cuesta $199. La tarjeta de video está diseñada para computadoras workstation y basado en la micro-arquitectura Polaris nombre clave Lexa.
Velocidad de reloj del núcleo - 925 MHz. Impulso de la velocidad del reloj - 1082 MHz. Tasa de llenado de texturas - 34.62 GTexel/s. Tecnología de proceso de manufactura - 14 nm. Número de transistores - 2200 million. Consumo de energía (TDP) - 65 Watt.
Tipo de memoria: GDDR5. Cantidad de RAM máxima - 4 GB. Ancho del bus de memoria - 128 bit. Velocidad de reloj de la memoria - 4000 MHz. Ancho de banda de la memoria - 96 GB/s.
Referencias
| PassMark G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop Face Detection |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop Ocean Surface Simulation |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop T-Rex |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop Video Composition |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop Bitcoin Mining |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 Car Chase Offscreen |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 Manhattan |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 T-Rex |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 Car Chase Offscreen |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 Manhattan |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 T-Rex |
|
|
| Nombre | Valor |
|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2415 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 415 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 14042 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection | 25.896 mPixels/s |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation | 486.804 Frames/s |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex | 2.503 Frames/s |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition | 53.111 Frames/s |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining | 100.658 mHash/s |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen | 2524 Frames |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan | 3274 Frames |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex | 3352 Frames |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen | 2524.000 Fps |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan | 3274.000 Fps |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex | 3352.000 Fps |
Desempeño en juego
Control (2019)
| Low, 1280x720 | 42.40 |
| Medium, 1920x1080 | 12.50 |
| High, 1920x1080 | 8.30 |
Total War: Three Kingdoms (2019)
| Low, 1280x720 | 55.50 |
| Medium, 1920x1080 | 15.30 |
| High, 1920x1080 | 9.90 |
| Ultra, 1920x1080 | 4.00 |
F1 2019 (2019)
| Low, 1280x720 | 59.00 |
| Medium, 1920x1080 | 33.00 |
| High, 1920x1080 | 25.00 |
| Ultra, 1920x1080 | 15.00 |
Rage 2 (2019)
| Low, 1280x720 | 40.90 |
| Medium, 1920x1080 | 16.80 |
| High, 1920x1080 | 14.10 |
| Ultra, 1920x1080 | 10.00 |
Metro Exodus (2019)
| Low, 1280x720 | 31.10 |
| Medium, 1920x1080 | 14.00 |
| High, 1920x1080 | 10.00 |
| Ultra, 1920x1080 | 7.00 |
Apex Legends (2019)
| Low, 1280x720 | 65.90 |
| Medium, 1920x1080 | 24.30 |
| High, 1920x1080 | 15.10 |
| Ultra, 1920x1080 | 13.20 |
Far Cry 5 (2018)
| Low, 1280x720 | 43.00 |
| Medium, 1920x1080 | 20.00 |
| High, 1920x1080 | 18.00 |
| Ultra, 1920x1080 | 17.00 |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)
| Low, 1280x720 | 25.20 |
| Medium, 1920x1080 | 16.65 |
| High, 1920x1080 | 15.15 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)
| Low, 1280x720 | 26.30 |
| Medium, 1920x1080 | 9.70 |
| High, 1920x1080 | 6.30 |
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016)
| Low, 1024x768 | 50.60 |
| Medium, 1366x768 | 36.22 |
| High, 1920x1080 | 18.54 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)
| Low, 1280x720 | 100.50 |
| Medium, 1366x768 | 86.50 |
| High, 1920x1080 | 48.55 |
| Ultra, 1920x1080 | 34.85 |
| 4K, 3840x2160 | 9.40 |
The Witcher 3 (2015)
| Low, 1024x768 | 58.10 |
| Medium, 1366x768 | 31.05 |
| High, 1920x1080 | 15.15 |
| Ultra, 1920x1080 | 10.30 |
| 4K, 3840x2160 | 5.20 |
Thief (2014)
| Medium, 1366x768 | 36.40 |
| High, 1366x768 | 34.90 |
| Ultra, 1920x1080 | 19.90 |
BioShock Infinite (2013)
| Low, 1280x720 | 186.60 |
| Medium, 1366x768 | 90.40 |
| High, 1366x768 | 82.35 |
| Ultra, 1920x1080 | 29.58 |
Tomb Raider (2013)
| Low, 1024x768 | 184.60 |
| Medium, 1366x768 | 98.50 |
| High, 1366x768 | 71.80 |
| Ultra, 1920x1080 | 35.00 |
Especificaciones
Esenciales |
|
| Arquitectura | Polaris |
| Nombre clave | Lexa |
| Fecha de lanzamiento | 27 May 2019 |
| Precio de lanzamiento (MSRP) | $199 |
| Lugar en calificación por desempeño | 849 |
| Tipo | Workstation |
Información técnica |
|
| Impulso de la velocidad de reloj | 1082 MHz |
| Unidades de Compute | 10 |
| Velocidad de reloj del núcleo | 925 MHz |
| Tecnología de proceso de manufactura | 14 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 86.56 GFLOPS |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1,385 GFLOPS |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1,385 GFLOPS |
| Pixel fill rate | 17.31 GPixel/s |
| Stream Processors | 640 |
| Tasa de llenado de textura | 34.62 GTexel/s |
| Diseño energético térmico (TDP) | 65 Watt |
| Número de transistores | 2200 million |
Puertos y salidas de video |
|
| Conectores de pantalla | 4x mini-DisplayPort |
Compatibilidad, dimensiones y requerimientos |
|
| Altura | Half Height |
| Interfaz | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Longitud | 6.6" (168 mm) |
| Conectores de energía complementarios | None |
Soporte de API |
|
| DirectX | 12.0 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 |
| Vulkan | |
Memoria |
|
| Cantidad máxima de RAM | 4 GB |
| Ancho de banda de la memoria | 96 GB/s |
| Ancho de bus de la memoria | 128 bit |
| Velocidad de reloj de memoria | 4000 MHz |
| Tipo de memoria | GDDR5 |
Tecnologías |
|
| AMD Eyefinity | |
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | |
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | |
Navegación
Elige un GPU
Compara tarjetas de video
Compara la AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 con otros
AMDRadeon Pro WX 3200 vs
ATIMobility Radeon X600
AMDRadeon Pro WX 3200 vs
ATIRadeon X300
AMDRadeon Pro WX 3200 vs
NVIDIAGeForce Go 6800
AMDRadeon Pro WX 3200 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8650D IGP
AMDRadeon Pro WX 3200 vs
NVIDIAQuadro M1000M
AMDRadeon Pro WX 3200 vs
AMDRadeon E9260 PCIe
