AMD Radeon Pro 575X vs Intel UHD Graphics 630
Vergleichende Analyse von AMD Radeon Pro 575X und Intel UHD Graphics 630 Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher, Technologien. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD Radeon Pro 575X
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 1 Jahr(e) 6 Monat(e) später
- 4871.5x mehr Texturfüllrate: 140.3 GTexel/s vs 28.8 GTexel / s
- 85.3x mehr Leitungssysteme: 2048 vs 24
- 7.5x bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 35017 vs 4657
- 6x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11237 vs 1870
- 6x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11237 vs 1870
- 2.2x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3458 vs 1596
- 2.2x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3458 vs 1596
- Etwa 1% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 3309
- Etwa 1% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 3309
| Spezifikationen | |
| Startdatum | 18 March 2019 vs 1 September 2017 |
| Texturfüllrate | 140.3 GTexel/s vs 28.8 GTexel / s |
| Leitungssysteme | 2048 vs 24 |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 35017 vs 4657 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11237 vs 1870 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11237 vs 1870 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3458 vs 1596 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3458 vs 1596 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3309 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3309 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der Intel UHD Graphics 630
- 8x geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 15 Watt vs 120 Watt
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 120 Watt |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 575X
GPU 2: Intel UHD Graphics 630
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Pro 575X | Intel UHD Graphics 630 |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 35017 | 4657 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11237 | 1870 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11237 | 1870 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3458 | 1596 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3458 | 1596 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3309 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3309 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1237 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 299 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.517 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 354.254 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.807 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 20.323 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 29.327 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 68 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
| AMD Radeon Pro 575X | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | |
|---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
| Architektur | GCN 4.0 | Generation 9.5 |
| Codename | Polaris 20 | Coffee Lake GT2 |
| Startdatum | 18 March 2019 | 1 September 2017 |
| Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 391 | 1234 |
| Typ | Laptop | Desktop |
Technische Info |
||
| Berechnungseinheiten | 32 | |
| Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 280.6 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 4.489 TFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.489 TFLOPS | |
| Leitungssysteme | 2048 | 24 |
| Pixel-Füllrate | 35.07 GPixel/s | |
| Texturfüllrate | 140.3 GTexel/s | 28.8 GTexel / s |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 120 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Anzahl der Transistoren | 5700 million | 189 million |
| Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1200 MHz | |
| Kerntaktfrequenz | 350 MHz | |
| Gleitkomma-Leistung | 460.8 gflops | |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
| Display-Anschlüsse | No outputs | No outputs |
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
| Schnittstelle | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
API-Unterstützung |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Speicher |
||
| Maximale RAM-Belastung | 4 GB | |
| Speicherbandbreite | 217.6 GB/s | |
| Breite des Speicherbusses | 256 bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
| Speichertyp | GDDR5 | |
| Gemeinsamer Speicher | 1 | |
Technologien |
||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| Quick Sync | ||

